paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 <scp>Wave</scp> : Leveraging Architecture Observation for Privacy-Preserving Model Oversight

WAVE:利用架构观测实现隐私保护的模型监管
ASPLOS Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 22026匹配度 3/10 · 论文聚焦 GPU 性能计数器与 SMT 一致性检查实现 LLM 推理的隐私保护运行时监管,属于硬件安全与运行时监控,并非用户核心关注的静态分析、Agentic 程序分析、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析。仅通过 SMT 形式化方法与 ML 系统有非常间接的关联,且未涉及 LLM/Agent 改进静态分析或浮点/贝叶斯交叉。引用 2 inbox
Haoxuan Xu, Chen Gong, Beijie Liu, Haizhong Zheng, Beidi Chen, Mengyuan Li
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 WAVE,用 GPU 性能计数器观测 LLM 推理,推断模型架构参数并用 SMT 一致性检查实现隐私保护的运行时监管。

LLM 推理服务需要在不暴露权重与代码的前提下获得运行时可见性,以确认实际执行与声明模型一致。WAVE 利用硬件约束不变量(访存、指令混合、Tensor Core 利用率)由模型线性代数结构诱导这一洞见,采集轻量级 GPU 性能计数器(PMC)轨迹,并采用两阶段流水线:先推断参数规模、层深、隐藏维度、批大小等架构属性,再用基于 SMT 的一致性检查器判断执行是否符合配置算力与声称模型的约束。在 LLaMA、GPT、Qwen 及 Ada Lovelace、Hopper、Blackwell 等 GPU 上评估,关键参数平均恢复误差为 6.8%,并能识别真实扰动下的伪装执行。

问题
如何在不暴露模型权重或代码的情况下,对 LLM 推理服务进行运行时验证,确认实际执行的模型与声明的配置一致?
方法
基于 GPU 性能计数器采集硬件约束不变量,通过两阶段流水线推断模型架构属性,并用基于 SMT 的一致性检查器判定执行是否与声称模型的约束相符。
评估
在 LLaMA、GPT、Qwen 等开源 LLM 架构与 NVIDIA Ada Lovelace、Hopper、Blackwell 等多代 GPU 上评估,关键模型参数平均恢复误差 6.8%,并能识别真实扰动下的伪装执行。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Large Language Models (LLMs) inference increasingly require mechanisms that provide runtime visibility into what is actually executing, without exposing model weights or code. We present WAVE, a hardware-grounded monitoring framework that leverages GPU performance counters (PMCs) to observe LLM inference. WAVE is built on the insight that legitimate executions of a given model must satisfy hardware-constrained invariants, such as memory accesses, instruction mix, and tensor-core utilization, induced by the model's linear-algebraic structure. WAVE collects lightweight PMC traces and applies a two-stage pipeline: (1) inferring architectural properties (e.g., parameter count, layer depth, hidden dimension, batch size) from the observed traces; and (2) using an SMT-based consistency checker to assess whether the execution aligns with the provisioned compute and the claimed model's constraints. We evaluate WAVE on common open-source LLM architectures, such as LLaMA, GPT, and Qwen, across multiple GPU architectures, including NVIDIA Ada Lovelace, Hopper, and Blackwell. Results show that WAVE recovers key model parameters with an average error of 6.8% and identifies disguised executions under realistic perturbations. By grounding oversight in hardware invariants, WAVE provides a practical avenue for continuous, privacy-preserving runtime monitoring of LLM services.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{XuGLZC026,
  title = {<scp>Wave</scp>
                    : Leveraging Architecture Observation for Privacy-Preserving Model Oversight},
  author = {Haoxuan Xu and Chen Gong and Beijie Liu and Haizhong Zheng and Beidi Chen and Mengyuan Li},
  booktitle = {ASPLOS},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3779212.3790247}
}