paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Academic and industry training for data modelling

数据建模的学术与产业培训
ICSE Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training2022匹配度 0/10 · 该论文讨论概念数据建模在学术与产业培训中的差异及教学改进,属于建模教育/培训研究,与用户关注的程序分析、LLM/Agent、浮点程序分析、贝叶斯程序分析等方向完全无关。引用 0 inbox
Daria Bogdanova, Monique Snoeck
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:比较学术与产业概念数据建模培训的异同,提出通过纠正基础建模错误提升双方培训质量并促进方法交换。

论文关注学术教育与产业培训在概念数据建模教学中的差异与共通点。作者指出,尽管两个场景目标与环境不同,硕士生与产业受训者在创建数据模型时会犯相似的基础错误。作为一篇 idea paper,文章对比了两种培训路径的异同,分析新手与专业人员共同出现的基础错误,并据此提出提升双方培训质量的想法,以及两类培训之间进行方法论交换的建议。论文未报告实证评估或具体工具,贡献在于问题界定、比较框架与改进入手点。

问题
学术培训与产业培训在概念数据建模上缺乏共同基础,且受训者均会犯基础建模错误。
方法
作为设想型论文,比较两类培训方法的异同,并分析新手与专业人员的基础错误以提出改进思路。
评估
论文未报告实证评估;通过概念性比较与错误分析来论证改进建议,并讨论方法论交换的可能性。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Finding a common ground between academic and industry training is a challenging task. However, despite all the differences between the two worlds, there is one important common aspect for the master students and industry trainees in the field of conceptual data modelling: the mistakes they make when creating data models. This idea paper describes the existing differences and similarities between two academic and industrial training approaches for teaching conceptual data modelling. We propose ideas for improvement of training quality on both sides by analysing and tackling the ground errors in conceptual data modelling made both by novices and professionals. Additionally, we propose the ideas for methodology exchanges between the two training types.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{BogdanovaS22,
  title = {Academic and industry training for data modelling},
  author = {Daria Bogdanova and Monique Snoeck},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.1145/3510456.3514167}
}