paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Towards Understanding Fairness and its Composition in Ensemble Machine Learning

迈向理解集成机器学习中的公平性及其组合
ICSE 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)2023匹配度 1/10 · 该论文研究集成机器学习模型的公平性组合与基准,属于ML公平性/基准方向,不涉及静态分析、LLM/Agent、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析。虽然标签含“机器学习与程序语言”,但摘要未体现与用户PL/程序分析研究画像的实质关联。引用 35 inbox
Usman Gohar, Sumon Biswas, Hridesh Rajan
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12arxiv: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:首个大规模研究集成学习中公平性如何组合,并给出168个模型基准与公平集成设计启示。

现有公平性研究多聚焦单一分类器,而真实机器学习模型常由多个独立或依赖的学习器以集成方式组合,公平性在其中的组合方式尚不清楚。本文系统研究 Bagging、Boosting、Stacking 与 Voting 等常用集成算法,从 Kaggle 收集 168 个集成模型,并在四个常用公平性数据集上使用现有公平性指标进行分析。结果发现,无需采用偏见缓解技术也可设计出更公平的集成;公平性组合与数据特征之间存在交互,可为公平集成设计提供指导;所构建基准可支持后续研究。这是目前规模较大的集成公平性组合研究之一。

问题
现有偏见度量与缓解方法主要针对单一分类器,集成学习中公平性如何由各学习器组合、超参数如何影响最终公平性尚缺乏系统理解。
方法
构建覆盖 Bagging、Boosting、Stacking、Voting 的 168 个 Kaggle 集成模型基准,在四个公平性数据集上用现有公平性指标分析公平性组合及超参数与数据特征的影响。
评估
通过大规模基准上的实证研究比较不同集成算法与模型的公平性表现,并总结公平集成设计启示;基准可供后续研究复用。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Machine Learning (ML) software has been widely adopted in modern society, with reported fairness implications for minority groups based on race, sex, age, etc. Many recent works have proposed methods to measure and mitigate algorithmic bias in ML models. The existing approaches focus on single classifier-based ML models. However, real-world ML models are often composed of multiple independent or dependent learners in an ensemble (e.g., Random Forest), where the fairness composes in a non-trivial way. How does fairness compose in ensembles? What are the fairness impacts of the learners on the ultimate fairness of the ensemble? Can fair learners result in an unfair ensemble? Furthermore, studies have shown that hyperparameters influence the fairness of ML models. Ensemble hyperparameters are more complex since they affect how learners are combined in different categories of ensembles. Understanding the impact of ensemble hyperparameters on fairness will help programmers design fair ensembles. Today, we do not understand these fully for different ensemble algorithms. In this paper, we comprehensively study popular real-world ensembles: Bagging, Boosting, Stacking, and Voting. We have developed a benchmark of 168 ensemble models collected from Kaggle on four popular fairness datasets. We use existing fairness metrics to understand the composition of fairness. Our results show that ensembles can be designed to be fairer without using mitigation techniques. We also identify the interplay between fairness composition and data characteristics to guide fair ensemble design. Finally, our benchmark can be leveraged for further research on fair ensembles. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first and largest studies on fairness composition in ensembles yet presented in the literature.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{abs-2212-04593,
  title = {Towards Understanding Fairness and its Composition in Ensemble Machine Learning},
  author = {Usman Gohar and Sumon Biswas and Hridesh Rajan},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.1109/icse48619.2023.00133}
}