paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Revisiting Android App Categorization

重新审视 Android 应用分类
ICSE Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering2024匹配度 1/10 · 该论文主题是 Android 应用自动分类质量及其对恶意软件检测等下游任务的影响,属于移动安全/应用分类方向,与用户关注的静态分析、LLM/Agent 交叉、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析没有直接关系;仅有“安全与隐私”和“程序分析”标签构成非常边缘的联系。引用 4 inbox
Marco Alecci, Jordan Samhi, Tegawende F. Bissyande, Jacques Klein
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:重新审视 Android 应用自动分类,指出错误分类会误导恶意软件检测等下游工具,并呼吁改进分类质量。

Android 应用自动分类被许多分析工具作为方法学的一部分,但错误分类会导致错误结论。摘要以 SlideIT Free Keyboard 为例:该应用在 Google Play 下载量超过 50 万,本属“Keyboard”类,却因描述侧重语言支持而常被误分为“Language”类,进而被误判为潜在恶意软件,尽管它实际是良性应用。这说明现有分类不可靠,会污染依赖它的分析结果。论文因此重新审视 Android 应用分类,目标是改进分类质量,使所有依赖分类的工具受益。摘要仅给出问题动机与实例,未展开具体方法、实验设计与评估结果。

问题
Android 应用自动分类不准确,尤其当应用描述与真实功能不一致时,会误导依赖分类的下游工具,例如将良性键盘应用误报为恶意软件。
方法
论文重新审视 Android 应用分类问题,旨在改进分类质量以惠及下游工具;摘要未具体说明所采用的方法。
评估
摘要以 SlideIT Free Keyboard 的误分类案例说明错误分类的后果,但未给出系统评估或量化结果。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Numerous tools rely on automatic categorization of Android apps as part of their methodology. However, incorrect categorization can lead to inaccurate outcomes, such as a malware detector wrongly flagging a benign app as malicious. One such example is the SlideIT Free Keyboard app, which has over 500 000 downloads on Google Play. Despite being a "Keyboard" app, it is often wrongly categorized alongside "Language" apps due to the app's description focusing heavily on language support, resulting in incorrect analysis outcomes, including mislabeling it as a potential malware when it is actually a benign app. Hence, there is a need to improve the categorization of Android apps to benefit all the tools relying on it.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot11284,
  title = {Revisiting Android App Categorization},
  author = {Marco Alecci and Jordan Samhi and Tegawende F. Bissyande and Jacques Klein},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.1145/3597503.3639094}
}