In call-by-value languages, some mutually-recursive definitions can be safely evaluated to build recursive functions or cyclic data structures, but some definitions (let rec x = x + 1) contain vicious circles and their evaluation fails at runtime. We propose a new static analysis to check the absence of such runtime failures. We present a set of declarative inference rules, prove its soundness with respect to the reference source-level semantics of Nordlander, Carlsson, and Gill [2008], and show that it can be directed into an algorithmic backwards analysis check in a surprisingly simple way. Our implementation of this new check replaced the existing check used by the OCaml programming language, a fragile syntactic criterion which let several subtle bugs slip through as the language kept evolving. We document some issues that arise when advanced features of a real-world functional language (exceptions in first-class modules, GADTs, etc.) interact with safety checking for recursive definitions.

@article{paperbot1146,
  title = {A practical mode system for recursive definitions},
  author = {Alban Reynaud and Gabriel Scherer and Jeremy Yallop},
  journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages},
  volume = {5},
  number = {POPL},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.1145/3434326}
}