一句话:通过对澳大利亚人的全国代表性调查,提出“碎片化意识”概念与隐私用户画像,指导隐私感知系统设计。
论文关注数字平台的数据收集与公众隐私认知之间的断裂。作者对239名澳大利亚人开展全国代表性混合方法调查,考察其对数字隐私、同意界面与《澳大利亚隐私法》的认知与困惑。结果显示,多数人怀疑数据被滥用却无法识别机制;超过半数“知道有问题”却说不清,正确理解指纹识别或跨设备追踪者不足20%。作者将这一现象概念化为“碎片化意识”(fractured awareness),认为系统设计主动扭曲公众理解,构成社会技术失败。与美国对比发现,澳大利亚人制度信任更高但功能性困惑相近。论文贡献包括面向隐私感知系统设计的需求层构念、三类隐私用户画像,以及监管不透明、暗黑模式同意和不平等界面制造系统性困惑的启示。
Governments and digital platforms are intensifying their use of data collection to enable personalization, analytics, and surveillance. At the same time, ordinary citizens increasingly sense that their privacy is being violated, yet struggle to explain how or why. To investigate this issue, we present the first nationally representative study of Australians’ awareness, confusion, and frustrations regarding digital privacy, consent interfaces, and the Australian Privacy Act. Drawing on a mixed-methods survey of 239 participants, we find that most Australians suspect their data is being misused but cannot identify the mechanisms behind it. More than half admit they “know something is wrong” yet cannot articulate what it is, while fewer than 20% correctly understand practices such as fingerprinting or cross-device tracking. We conceptualize this disconnect as fractured awareness, a socio-technical condition in which users are not only uninformed but misinformed by the very systems meant to protect them. This constitutes a critical socio-technical failure, where system design actively distorts public understanding of digital privacy practices and protections. We benchmark our findings against U.S. studies and show that Australians exhibit higher institutional trust but similar levels of functional confusion, exposing privacy myths that are culturally shaped yet globally persistent. This paper contributes to software engineering by introducing fractured awareness as a requirements–level construct for privacy-aware system design, developing privacy personas (Misinformed Majority, Resigned Skeptics, Aware Activists) as design archetypes, and demonstrating how regulatory opacity, dark-pattern consent mechanisms, and inequitable interfaces generate systemic confusion. We describe key implications for researchers and practitioners, including regulators, technologists, and platform designers, and argue that addressing fractured awareness is essential to restoring public trust and enabling meaningful digital consent.