一句话:通过两校130名本科生调查,揭示生成式AI在软件工程教育中的使用、收益、挑战与伦理诉求。
本文关注生成式AI工具(如ChatGPT、GitHub Copilot)进入软件工程教育后,学生如何使用、获益并面临哪些问题。作者对两所大学的130名软件工程本科生开展问卷调查,结合李克特量表与开放题,从使用情境、感知收益、挑战、伦理与教学期望五个维度收集数据。结果显示,学生主要将GenAI用于渐进式学习和高级实现,认为其有助于头脑风暴与建立信心;但也遇到解释不清、难以适配输出等困难。学生关注公平性与学术不端等伦理问题,并希望获得更清晰的教学指导。研究强调需要提供学习支架、伦理政策与适应性教学策略,以促进公平且有效的学习。
Context. The rise of generative AI (GenAI) tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot has transformed how software is learned and written. In software engineering (SE) education, these tools offer new opportunities for support, but also raise concerns about over-reliance, ethical use, and impacts on learning. Objective. This study investigates how undergraduate SE students use GenAI tools, focusing on the benefits, challenges, ethical concerns, and instructional expectations that shape their experiences. Method. We conducted a survey with 130 undergraduate students from two universities. The survey combined structured Likert-scale items and open-ended questions to investigate five dimensions: usage context, perceived benefits, challenges, ethical and instructional perceptions. Results. Students most often use GenAI for incremental learning and advanced implementation, reporting benefits such as brainstorming support and confidence-building. At the same time, they face challenges including unclear rationales and difficulty adapting outputs. Students highlight ethical concerns around fairness and misconduct, and call for clearer instructional guidance. Conclusion. GenAI is reshaping SE education in nuanced ways. Our findings underscore the need for scaffolding, ethical policies, and adaptive instructional strategies to ensure that GenAI supports equitable and effective learning.