paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Examining Productivity in Educational Environments

考察教育环境中的生产力
ICSE Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering2026匹配度 1/10 · 该论文研究软件工程毕业设计项目中师生对生产力的认知,属于软件工程教育与开发者生产力研究,与用户关注的静态分析、LLM/Agent、浮点程序分析、贝叶斯程序分析等核心方向无直接关联;仅标签“编程环境与开发者工具”有边缘联系。引用 0 inbox
Vinicius F. Gonçalves, João Pedro T. E. Santo, Guilherme F. Silva, Caio F. A. Tome, Jucele F. A. Vasconcellos, Patrícia G. F. Matsubara
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:通过访谈与问卷分析软件工程毕业设计项目中师生对生产力的多维认知,并对照 SPACE 框架。

本文关注软件工程师生产力这一业界议题,主张相关反思应从本科教育阶段开始。研究以某软件工程本科毕业设计(capstone)项目为对象,对六位教授进行半结构化访谈,并向学生发放问卷,采用主题分析理解双方视角。结果发现,教授主动寻找多种生产力信号,包括与教育情境相关的学习迹象,以及行为线索和工作态度所体现的投入度;学生同样持有多维生产力观,但需要更多讨论以应对未来软件产业中的生产力问题。教授还考虑影响生产力的情境因素。结论指出,产业与学术环境虽有差异,但存在重要相似性,使 capstone 项目中的生产力讨论具有潜力;师生视角与 SPACE 框架的多个维度相吻合。

问题
软件工程师生产力是业界关注重点,但相关反思与训练应否及如何从本科教育阶段开始尚待探讨。
方法
对某软件工程本科 capstone 项目的六位教授进行半结构化访谈,并向学生发放问卷,使用主题分析归纳双方观点。
评估
通过定性主题分析比较教授与学生的生产力认知,并讨论其与 SPACE 框架维度的对应关系。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Context: The productivity of software engineers is a major industry concern. The debate on productivity has evolved over the years, from oversimplistic quantitative analyses to multidimensional approaches. Rather than being confined to industry or research, reflections on productivity should begin at the undergraduate education, preferably with hands-on experiences. Objective: This study investigates the perceptions of productivity among professors and students in a capstone program of a software engineering undergraduate course. Method: We conducted six semi-structured interviews with professors and administered a questionnaire to students. We used thematic analysis to understand their perspectives. Results: Professors actively look for a variety of signs and cues of productivity, including learning signs, which are relevant for an educational context, and for behavioral cues and work attitudes that signal engagement. Students collectively also have a multifaceted view of productivity, but would benefit from further discussion on the topic, in preparation to deal with productivity issues in the software industry. Professors also consider contextual factors that impact productivity. Conclusions: Although the industrial and academic environments differ, they also share relevant similarities that make discussions about productivity potentially fruitful in capstone projects. For instance, the perspectives of both industry professionals and students match dimensions of the SPACE (Satisfaction and Well-Being, Performance, Activity, Communication and Collaboration, Efficiency and Flow) framework.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot12050,
  title = {Examining Productivity in Educational Environments},
  author = {Vinicius F. Gonçalves and João Pedro T. E. Santo and Guilherme F. Silva and Caio F. A. Tome and Jucele F. A. Vasconcellos and Patrícia G. F. Matsubara},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3786580.3786993}
}