paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P1 Agentic Generation of Structured Clinical Specifications for Digital Healthcare Services

面向数字医疗服务的结构化临床规约的智能体式生成
ICSE Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering2026匹配度 5/10 · 论文用 LLM 智能体把非结构化临床文档转换为机器可读的行动树(DSL),产物可接入模型驱动工程与形式验证流水线,与“AI→PL:用 LLM/Agent 改进形式化验证/规格生成”这一方向部分重合;但它本身不涉及程序静态分析、浮点或贝叶斯程序分析,核心是医疗领域建模与应用工具,验证环节只是下游用途而非研究重点。引用 0 inbox
Bruno Guindani, Matteo Camilli, Livia Lestingi, Marcello Maria Bersani
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 MARACTUS,用 LLM 智能体把非结构化临床文档转换为机器可读行动树,支撑模型驱动工程与形式验证。

临床指南是标准化、循证诊疗的基础,但其叙事化、非结构化的形式容易导致不一致与解读错误;WHO 也强调需要机器可读的规约来支持临床决策,而现有此类规约多由人工编写,易出错。本文提出 MARACTUS:一种智能体式方法,将非结构化医疗文档转换为表示临床流程的结构化机器可读行动树(MAT)。生成的 MAT 可输入模型驱动工程流水线、支持形式验证,并集成到临床决策支持系统中。MARACTUS 在编排框架内组合了输入构造器、大语言模型与语法检查器,在保证遵循固定文法的同时,借助经策展的知识库保留临床医生的监督。作者以两个示例临床案例、两个先进 LLM,在不同文档子集上比较零样本与少样本提示策略进行验证:语法正确率达 97.5%,相对人工基准的临床成功率为 62.5%,且领域专家在多个评估维度上给其中过半 MAT 打出了 ≥4/5 的临床有效性评分。

问题
临床指南以非结构化叙事形式存在,难以一致解读;机器可读的临床规约目前依赖人工编写,过程易错且难以维护。
方法
MARACTUS 在编排框架中组合输入构造器、大语言模型与语法检查器,通过固定文法约束与经策展知识库实现临床医生监督,将非结构化文档转为机器可读行动树(MAT),并可接入模型驱动工程流水线与形式验证。
评估
在两个示例临床案例与两个先进 LLM 上,针对不同文档子集比较零样本与少样本提示策略;报告语法正确率 97.5%、临床成功率 62.5%,并由领域专家在多维度上对过半 MAT 给出 ≥4/5 的有效性评分。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Clinical guidelines are essential for standardized and evidence-based patient care, yet their narrative, unstructured form often leads to inconsistencies and interpretation errors. As emphasized by the WHO, there is a need for machine-readable specifications to support clinical decision-making, but these are currently developed by hand, making the process error-prone. We present MARACTUS, an agentic methodology for converting unstructured healthcare documents into structured Machine-readable Action Trees (MATs) that represent clinical procedures. The produced MATs can feed model-driven engineering pipelines, enable formal verification, and integrate into clinical decision support systems, maximizing their impact on safer, more transparent, and continuously updatable healthcare software. MARACTUS combines an input constructor, a Large Language Model (LLM), and a syntax checker within an orchestration framework, ensuring adherence to a fixed grammar while maintaining clinician oversight via a curated knowledge base. We validate MARACTUS using two exemplar clinical cases and two state-of-the-art LLMs, comparing zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies across subsets of documents. Our evaluation demonstrates a syntactic correctness rate of 97.5% and a clinical success rate of 62.5% relative to human ground truth, while domain experts rated over half of the MATs as clinically valid (with scores ≥ 4/5) across multiple evaluation dimensions.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot12061,
  title = {Agentic Generation of Structured Clinical Specifications for Digital Healthcare Services},
  author = {Bruno Guindani and Matteo Camilli and Livia Lestingi and Marcello Maria Bersani},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3786581.3786943}
}