一句话:提出 REAP 自动化流水线,从真实开发者-智能体会话构建可执行、可复现的生产分布基准 Harvest。
生产部署 AI 编码智能体需要快速、可复现的评估信号,但 A/B 测试耗时、影子部署不可复现、公开基准与生产分布不一致。本文提出 REAP:无需人工标注,从真实开发者-智能体会话自动整理基准,并用 LLM 任务分类、智能体式测试相关性验证和多轮稳定性检查剔除不可测提示、错配与 flaky 测试。所得 Harvest 覆盖四种以上语言,任务多来自 Hack,明显不同于偏重 Python 的公开基准。五个前沿模型的解决率为 42.9%–58.2%,能揭示部署相关的能力差异;因源码私有,作者公开整理方法与案例。
Production deployment of AI coding agents requires fast, reproducible evaluation signals. Existing industrial practices trade off speed and fidelity: online A/B testing takes weeks and risks user experience, shadow deployment yields signals that are not reproducible across runs, and public benchmarks diverge from production workloads in language distribution, prompt style, and codebase structure. This paper presents REAP (Relevance and Execution-Audited Pipeline), an automated curation pipeline that constructs production-derived benchmarks from real developer-agent sessions without manual labeling. Such curation, while in-distribution to production usage, runs into several challenges. Untestable prompts, misaligned tests, and test flakiness all compromise evaluation reliability. While tasks can be manually audited to ensure only high-quality tasks remain in the benchmark, this approach is infeasible in the monorepo setting: the build infrastructure state is often ephemeral in large monorepos and requires the benchmark to be continuously re-curated against the current codebase. As manual verification cannot be sustained at this cadence, REAP adds an automated verification layer using LLM-based task classification, agentic test-relevance validation, and multi-run stability checks to ensure the executable benchmark yields trustworthy signals. We use REAP to curate Harvest, a benchmark where each task feeds the coding agent a real developer prompt and verifies the resulting code change against fail-to-pass tests retrieved from production. Harvest’s distribution spans more than four programming languages with a majority of tasks drawn from Hack, a meaningful divergence from public benchmarks which are skewed towards Python. Model and harness evaluations reveal that solve rates range from 42.9% to 58.2% across five frontier models, surfacing capability differences that inform concrete deployment decisions. The underlying corpus contains proprietary source code and cannot be released publicly; we share our automated curation methodology and case studies to enable other organizations to construct similar production-derived benchmarks at scale.
@inproceedings{paperbot12266,
title = {REAP: Automatic Curation of Coding Agent Benchmarks from Interactive Production Usage},
author = {Smriti Jha and Matteo Paltenghi and Chandra Maddila and Vijayaraghavan Murali and Shubham Ugare and Satish Chandra},
booktitle = {ASE},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1145/3832783.3834519}
}