paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Not as Sweet by Another Name: An Empirical Study of Format Robustness in LLM Document Workflows

换个名字就不甜了:LLM 文档工作流中的格式鲁棒性实证研究
ASE Proceedings of the 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering2026匹配度 3/10 · 该论文研究LLM文档工作流在格式变化下的鲁棒性,属于LLM软件系统测试与可靠性方向,但未涉及静态分析、形式化验证、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析等用户核心研究方向,与Agentic程序的关联也较弱。引用 0 inbox
Xiaoyu Zhang, Xianyun Cheng, Tianlin Li, Yuwei Zheng, Yue Yang, Yang Liu
crossref: 2026-10-09

AI 速览

一句话:提出格式感知蜕变测试框架,系统揭示 LLM 文档工作流因文档格式变化而出现的准确率下降与决策漂移。

论文关注 LLM 驱动软件系统转向以文档为中心的端到端工作流后,同一语义内容以不同文档格式(如 CSV)上传时是否仍保持稳健。现有测试多聚焦单一提示字符串输入,忽略格式因素。作者提出格式感知蜕变测试框架,定义三条蜕变关系,并在四个代表性 LLM 工作流、四类真实任务和四种文档格式上执行 48,000 次运行。结果显示格式变化构成系统性威胁:仅切换格式即可使准确率最高下降 53.63%,超过 41% 的实例发生决策漂移。作者进一步设计面向用户的轻量缓解策略,无需重训练即可恢复最高 44.21% 的格式诱导决策漂移,并指出文档格式并非中性封装,而是影响 LLM 软件可靠性的关键因素。

问题
现有 LLM 测试工作多假设输入为单一提示字符串,未回答同一语义内容以不同文档格式进入端到端文档工作流时,系统能否保持稳健行为。
方法
提出格式感知蜕变测试框架,用三条蜕变关系系统评估 LLM 文档工作流的格式鲁棒性,并开展多工作流、多任务、多格式的大规模实证。
评估
在四个代表性 LLM 工作流、四类真实任务、四种文档格式上执行 48,000 次工作流运行,量化准确率下降与决策漂移,并评估轻量缓解策略的恢复效果。
原文摘要(Abstract)

LLM-driven software systems are rapidly evolving from plain-text conversations to document-centric end-to-end workflows, where the same semantic content can be delivered in diverse document formats (e.g., CSV) through file upload interfaces. Yet existing testing work focuses on the robustness and reliability of models and systems whose input is a single prompt string, leaving a critical question unanswered: Can these document workflows maintain robust behaviors when the same content arrives in a different document format? To fill the gap, in this paper, we propose a format-aware metamorphic testing framework with three metamorphic relations to comprehensively evaluate the format robustness of end-to-end LLM document workflows. Based on this framework, we conduct a large-scale empirical study spanning four representative LLM workflows, four real-world tasks, and four document formats, comprising a total of 48,000 workflow executions. Our findings reveal that format variation poses a systematic and serious threat. Merely switching formats can cause accuracy to drop by up to 53.63% and trigger decision drifts in over 41% of instances. We further design lightweight mitigation strategies from the users’ perspective that recover up to 44.21% of format-induced decision drift without model retraining. Our study demonstrates that document format is not a neutral wrapper but a critical factor affecting the reliability of LLM software systems, calling for corresponding testing and safeguards in the deployment in real-world high-stakes scenarios.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{abs-2607-27648,
  title = {Not as Sweet by Another Name: An Empirical Study of Format Robustness in LLM Document Workflows},
  author = {Xiaoyu Zhang and Xianyun Cheng and Tianlin Li and Yuwei Zheng and Yue Yang and Yang Liu},
  booktitle = {ASE},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3832783.3837456}
}