In 2025, SE publishing faces an existential crisis of scalability. As our communities swell globally and integrate fast-moving methodologies like LLMs, traditional peer-review practices are collapsing under the strain. The "bureaucratic anomaly" of monolithic review has become mathematically unsustainable, creating a stochastic "lottery" that punishes novelty and exhausts researchers. This paper, written from the perspective of 2036, documents potential solutions. Here, the editors of ASE, EMSE, IST, JSS, TOSEM and TSE dream a collective dream of a brighter future. In summary first we stopped fighting (The Journal Alliance). Then we fixed the process (The Lottery / Unbundling / Fixing the Benchmark Graveyard). And then we fixed the culture (Cathedrals/Bazaars).

@inproceedings{abs-2601-19217,
  title = {SE Journals in 2036: Looking Back at the Future We Need to Have},
  author = {Tim Menzies and Paris Avgeriou and Robert Feldt and Mauro Pezzè and Abhik Roychoudhury and Miroslaw. Staron and Sebastian Uchitel and Thomas Zimmermann},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3793657.3793874}
}