paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Well Behaved Transition Systems

行为良好的迁移系统
LMCS vol.Volume 13, Issue 32017匹配度 2/10 · 该论文属于程序验证/逻辑与自动机方向的理论工作,研究 WSTS 覆盖性可判定性的弱化假设,与方法论上关注 LLM/Agent 与静态分析、形式化验证交叉的研究画像几乎无关;未涉及浮点程序分析、贝叶斯程序分析或工业落地。引用 24 inbox
Michael Blondin, Alain Finkel, Pierre McKenzie
dblp: 2026-09-10crossref: 2026-09-10arxiv: 2026-09-10

AI 速览

一句话:证明仅需无无限反链的单调迁移系统仍可判定覆盖性,并定义其严格超类 WBTS。

本文研究定义 well-structured transition systems(WSTS)的 well-quasi-ordering 是否是可判定 coverability 的最弱假设。作者放松良拟序条件,只要求单调迁移系统不存在无限反链,并将由此得到的 WSTS 真超类称为 well behaved transition systems(WBTS)。他们证明 WBTS 上 coverability 仍然可判定;但在通常假设下,boundedness 与 termination 对 WBTS 不可判定,并表明更强的单调性条件可强制这些问题的可判定性。证明与已有 WSTS 证明类似甚至相同,但结论出人意料:二十年来被视为最小的隐含假设可被有意义地放松,从而以抽象方式处理更多序关系。

问题
WSTS 理论中良拟序假设是否可进一步弱化,同时保持 coverability 可判定。
方法
将良拟序放松为无无限反链,针对单调迁移系统定义 WBTS,并沿用或调整 WSTS 的证明技术分析覆盖性、有界性与终止性。
评估
证明 WBTS 的 coverability 可判定且为 WSTS 严格超类;同时给出 boundedness 与 termination 在通常假设下的不可判定性,以及更强单调性下的可判定性。
原文摘要(Abstract)

The well-quasi-ordering (i.e., a well-founded quasi-ordering such that all antichains are finite) that defines well-structured transition systems (WSTS) is shown not to be the weakest hypothesis that implies decidability of the coverability problem. We show coverability decidable for monotone transition systems that only require the absence of infinite antichains and call well behaved transitions systems (WBTS) the new strict superclass of the class of WSTS that arises. By contrast, we confirm that boundedness and termination are undecidable for WBTS under the usual hypotheses, and show that stronger monotonicity conditions can enforce decidability. Proofs are similar or even identical to existing proofs but the surprising message is that a hypothesis implicitely assumed minimal for twenty years in the theory of WSTS can meaningfully be relaxed, allowing more orderings to be handled in an abstract way.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figures

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@article{BlondinFM17,
  title = {Well Behaved Transition Systems},
  author = {Michael Blondin and Alain Finkel and Pierre McKenzie},
  journal = {Logical Methods in Computer Science},
  volume = {Volume 13, Issue 3},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.23638/lmcs-13(3:24)2017}
}