Program logics and semantics tell a pleasant story about sequential composition: when executing (S1;S2), we first execute S1 then S2. To improve performance, however, processors execute instructions out of order, and compilers reorder programs even more dramatically. By design, single-threaded systems cannot observe these reorderings; however, multiple-threaded systems can, making the story considerably less pleasant. A formal attempt to understand the resulting mess is known as a “relaxed memory model.” Prior models either fail to address sequential composition directly, or overly restrict processors and compilers, or permit nonsense thin-air behaviors which are unobservable in practice. To support sequential composition while targeting modern hardware, we enrich the standard event-based approach with preconditions and families of predicate transformers. When calculating the meaning of (S1; S2), the predicate transformer applied to the precondition of an event e from S2 is chosen based on the set of events in S1 upon which e depends. We apply this approach to two existing memory models.

@article{paperbot1584,
  title = {The leaky semicolon: compositional semantic dependencies for relaxed-memory concurrency},
  author = {Alan Jeffrey and James Riely and Mark Batty and Simon Cooksey and Ilya Kaysin and Anton Podkopaev},
  journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages},
  volume = {6},
  number = {POPL},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.1145/3498716}
}