paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Minimisation of Multiplicity Tree Automata

多重树自动机的最小化
LMCS vol.Volume 13, Issue 12017匹配度 1/10 · 该论文研究多重树自动机状态最小化及其复杂度,属于纯自动机与计算复杂性理论,不涉及机器学习系统/Agentic 程序静态分析、LLM 辅助静态分析、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析。虽然形式化方法领域相邻,但与本研究画像的核心问题几乎没有直接交集。引用 10 inbox
Stefan Kiefer, Ines Marusic, James Worrell
dblp: 2026-09-10crossref: 2026-09-10arxiv: 2026-09-10

AI 速览

一句话:给出有理数域上多重树自动机状态数最小化的多项式时间算法,并将其复杂度与多项式恒等测试相联系。

本文研究有理数域上多重树自动机的状态数最小化问题。作者提出一个在单位代价算术模型下多项式时间运行的最小化算法,并证明该最小化判定问题与多项式恒等测试(PIT)在对数空间意义下等价,因此若在标准图灵机上获得多项式界将意味着 PIT 复杂度突破。所提技术还改进多重词自动机的最小化,给出 NC 算法。最后研究最小一致性问题:给定带权词或树的有限样本,是否存在 n 个状态的一致自动机;作者证明该判定问题对词和固定字母秩树均对有理数存在理论(∃R)完全。

问题
研究多重树自动机状态数最小化及其判定复杂度,以及从带权词/树样本构造最小一致自动机的复杂度。
方法
提出单位代价算术下多项式时间的最小化算法,借助多项式恒等测试与代数技术,并给出多重词自动机的 NC 最小化算法。
评估
通过理论复杂度分析进行:证明最小化判定与 PIT logspace 等价,并证明最小一致性问题对 ∃R 完全。
原文摘要(Abstract)

We consider the problem of minimising the number of states in a multiplicity tree automaton over the field of rational numbers. We give a minimisation algorithm that runs in polynomial time assuming unit-cost arithmetic. We also show that a polynomial bound in the standard Turing model would require a breakthrough in the complexity of polynomial identity testing by proving that the latter problem is logspace equivalent to the decision version of minimisation. The developed techniques also improve the state of the art in multiplicity word automata: we give an NC algorithm for minimising multiplicity word automata. Finally, we consider the minimal consistency problem: does there exist an automaton with $n$ states that is consistent with a given finite sample of weight-labelled words or trees? We show that this decision problem is complete for the existential theory of the rationals, both for words and for trees of a fixed alphabet rank.Comment: Paper to be published in Logical Methods in Computer Science. Minor editing changes from previous version

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@article{KieferMW15,
  title = {Minimisation of Multiplicity Tree Automata},
  author = {Stefan Kiefer and Ines Marusic and James Worrell},
  journal = {Logical Methods in Computer Science},
  volume = {Volume 13, Issue 1},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.23638/lmcs-13(1:16)2017}
}