paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Revamping Verilog Semantics for Foundational Verification

为根基性验证重构 Verilog 语义
OOPSLA 9(OOPSLA2)2025匹配度 2/10 · 论文研究 Verilog 形式语义与 Rocq 机械化验证,属于形式验证/程序语言领域,但与用户核心方向(LLM/Agent 与静态分析/形式化验证交叉、浮点程序分析、贝叶斯程序分析)没有直接关联。它未涉及 LLM/Agent,也不是面向机器学习系统或 Agentic 程序的静态分析。引用 1 inbox
Joonwon Choi, Jaewoo Kim, Jeehoon Kang
crossref: 2026-09-10

AI 速览

一句话:提出基于最小不动点的 Verilog 语义,支持周期级求值与模块化推理,并在 Rocq 中证明其与标准调度语义等价。

Verilog RTL 设计的验证长期依赖模型检测,但存在状态爆炸、表达力有限与可信基庞大等问题。演绎验证虽表达力强、TCB 小,却因 Verilog 标准语义的非确定性与全局调度难以应用。本文提出一种面向演绎验证的新 Verilog 语义,以最小不动点为核心,实现周期级函数式求值与模块化推理;针对可综合设计,证明该语义与标准调度语义等价。作者在 Rocq 中机器化全部结果,并完成流水线 RISC-V 处理器的模块化功能正确性与进展性验证,表明该语义可支撑根基性硬件验证。

问题
Verilog 标准语义的非确定性与全局调度使演绎验证难以应用,而模型检测又受限于状态爆炸、表达力不足和庞大 TCB。
方法
提出基于最小不动点的 Verilog 语义,以支持周期级函数式求值与模块化推理,并证明其对可综合设计与标准调度语义等价。
评估
在 Rocq 中机器化全部语义等价性证明,并对流水线 RISC-V 处理器进行模块化的功能正确性与进展性验证。
原文摘要(Abstract)

In formal hardware verification, particularly for Register-Transfer Level (RTL) designs in Verilog, model checking has been the predominant technique. However, it suffers from state explosion, limited expressive power, and a large trusted computing base (TCB). Deductive verification offers greater expressive power and enables foundational verification with a minimal TCB. Nevertheless, Verilog’s standard semantics, characterized by its nondeterministic and global scheduling, pose significant challenges to its application. To address these challenges, we propose a new Verilog semantics designed to facilitate deductive verification. Our semantics is based on least fixpoints to enable cycle-level functional evaluation and modular reasoning. For foundational verification, we prove our semantics equivalent to the standard scheduling semantics for synthesizable designs. We demonstrate the benefits of our semantics with a modular verification of a pipelined RISC-V processor’s functional correctness and progress guarantees. All our results are mechanized in Rocq.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@article{paperbot2914,
  title = {Revamping Verilog Semantics for Foundational Verification},
  author = {Joonwon Choi and Jaewoo Kim and Jeehoon Kang},
  journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages},
  volume = {9},
  number = {OOPSLA2},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.1145/3763084}
}