This paper introduces an ML / Haskell like programming language with nested inductive and coinductive algebraic datatypes called \chariot. Functions are defined by arbitrary recursive definitions and can thus lead to non-termination and other ``bad'' behavior. \chariot comes with a totality checker that tags possibly ill-behaved definitions. Such a totality checker is mandatory in the context of proof assistants based on type theory like Agda. Proving correctness of this checker is far from trivial and relies on - an interpretation of types as parity games, - an interpretation of correct values as winning strategies for those games, - the Lee, Jones and Ben Amram's size-change principle, used to check that the strategies induced by recursive definitions are winning. This paper develops the first two points, the last step being the subject of an upcoming paper. A prototype has been implemented and can be used to experiment with the resulting totality checker, giving a practical argument in favor of this principle.

@article{paperbot3380,
  title = {Totality for Mixed Inductive and Coinductive Types},
  author = {Pierre Hyvernat},
  journal = {Logical Methods in Computer Science},
  volume = {Volume 21, Issue 3},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.46298/lmcs-21(3:19)2025}
}