paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 RFC-directed differential testing of certificate validation in SSL/TLS implementations

面向 RFC 的 SSL/TLS 实现证书验证差分测试
ICSE Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering2018匹配度 2/10 · 该论文研究 SSL/TLS 证书验证的 RFC 导向差分测试,属于软件测试与安全领域,使用了动态符号执行;但未涉及用户画像中的 LLM/Agent 与程序分析交叉、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析等核心方向。引用 26 inbox
Chu Chen, Cong Tian, Zhenhua Duan, Liang Zhao
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出由 RFC 自动提取规则并经动态符号执行生成证书的差分测试方法,用于发现 SSL/TLS 证书验证漏洞。

SSL/TLS 协议中的证书验证对互联网安全至关重要,因此需要检查各实现是否正确实现了证书验证。本文提出一种由标准 RFC 指导的新型差分测试方法 RFCcert。首先从 RFC 中自动提取证书规则,其次通过动态符号执行生成低级测试用例,然后自动组装为高级测试用例,即证书,最后用这些证书测试 SSL/TLS 实现中的证书验证以揭示潜在漏洞或缺陷。RFCcert 的优势包括:证书根据标准而非遗传变异组装,因而具有差异针对性;既能揭示传统差分测试的无效性,也能完成传统差分测试无法进行的测试;支持工具已实现,大量实验表明该方法能有效发现 SSL/TLS 实现中的缺陷。

问题
SSL/TLS 证书验证是互联网安全的关键环节,但难以检测各实现是否正确遵循标准。
方法
从 RFC 自动提取证书规则,利用动态符号执行生成低级测试用例,再自动组装成证书并进行差分测试。
评估
实现了 RFCcert 支持工具,并通过大量实验表明该方法能有效发现 SSL/TLS 实现中的缺陷或漏洞。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Certificate validation in Secure Socket Layer or Transport Layer Security protocol (SSL/TLS) is critical to Internet security. Thus, it is significant to check whether certificate validation in SSL/TLS is correctly implemented. With this motivation, we propose a novel differential testing approach which is directed by the standard Request For Comments (RFC). First, rules of certificates are extracted automatically from RFCs. Second, low-level test cases are generated through dynamic symbolic execution. Third, high-level test cases, i.e. certificates, are assembled automatically. Finally, with the assembled certificates being test cases, certificate validations in SSL/TLS implementations are tested to reveal latent vulnerabilities or bugs. Our approach named RFCcert has the following advantages: (1) certificates of RFCcert are discrepancy-targeted since they are assembled according to standards instead of genetics; (2) with the obtained certificates, RFCcert not only reveals the invalidity of traditional differential testing but also is able to conduct testing that traditional differential testing cannot do; and (3) the supporting tool of RFCcert has been implemented and extensive experiments show that the approach is effective in finding bugs of SSL/TLS implementations.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot4419,
  title = {RFC-directed differential testing of certificate validation in SSL/TLS implementations},
  author = {Chu Chen and Cong Tian and Zhenhua Duan and Liang Zhao},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2018},
  doi = {10.1145/3180155.3180226}
}