paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 GUILeak

GUILeak:检测 Android 应用中用户输入数据的隐私泄露
ICSE Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering2018匹配度 3/10 · 论文属于程序分析与抽象解释在 Android 隐私泄露检测中的应用,与用户关注的静态分析技术有弱关联;但其目标领域是移动安全与隐私政策合规,不涉及 LLM/Agent、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析,因此与核心研究方向匹配度较低。引用 97 inbox
Xiaoyin Wang, Xue Qin, Mitra Bokaei Hosseini, Rocky Slavin, Travis D. Breaux, Jianwei Niu
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 GUILeak,自动检测 Android 应用对用户输入数据的隐私泄露并判定其是否违反隐私政策。

Android 应用广泛收集用户数据,隐私保护成为难题。应用虽提供隐私政策声明所收集与处理的信息,但难以将声明追溯到对应代码以核实一致性;现有政策对齐方法仅关注通过 Android 平台直接访问的信息(如位置、设备 ID),无法处理用户输入这一主要隐私来源。本文提出 GUILeak,自动检测给定 Android 应用对用户输入数据的隐私泄露,并判断其是否可能违反应用的隐私政策声明。在金融、健康、约会三个隐私相关类别的 120 个流行应用上评估,共检测到 21 个强违规与 18 个弱违规。

问题
如何自动检测 Android 应用对用户输入数据的隐私泄露,并判断该泄露是否违反应用的隐私政策声明;现有方法无法处理用户输入这类主要隐私来源。
方法
提出 GUILeak,自动分析 Android 应用中用户输入数据的流向,并与应用的隐私政策声明对照,判定泄露是否构成违规。
评估
在来自金融、健康、约会三个隐私相关类别的 120 个流行 Android 应用上进行评估,检测到 21 个强违规和 18 个弱违规。
原文摘要(Abstract)

The Android mobile platform supports billions of devices across more than 190 countries around the world. This popularity coupled with user data collection by Android apps has made privacy protection a well-known challenge in the Android ecosystem. In practice, app producers provide privacy policies disclosing what information is collected and processed by the app. However, it is difficult to trace such claims to the corresponding app code to verify whether the implementation is consistent with the policy. Existing approaches for privacy policy alignment focus on information directly accessed through the Android platform (e.g., location and device ID), but are unable to handle user input, a major source of private information. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that automatically detects privacy leaks of user-entered data for a given Android app and determines whether such leakage may violate the app's privacy policy claims. For evaluation, we applied our approach to 120 popular apps from three privacy-relevant app categories: finance, health, and dating. The results show that our approach was able to detect 21 strong violations and 18 weak violations from the studied apps.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot4515,
  title = {GUILeak},
  author = {Xiaoyin Wang and Xue Qin and Mitra Bokaei Hosseini and Rocky Slavin and Travis D. Breaux and Jianwei Niu},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2018},
  doi = {10.1145/3180155.3180196}
}