paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Evaluating model testing and model checking for finding requirements violations in Simulink models

评估模型测试与模型检测在发现 Simulink 模型需求违规中的效果
FSE Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering2019匹配度 3/10 · 该论文属于程序验证与测试方向,并包含工业基准和工具对比,与用户对形式化验证/程序分析的宽泛兴趣有少量交集;但它聚焦 Simulink/CPS 模型检测与模型测试,不涉及 LLM/Agent、静态分析用于 ML 系统、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析等核心方向。引用 1 inbox
Shiva Nejati, Khouloud Gaaloul, Claudio Menghi, Lionel C. Briand, Stephen Foster, David Wolfe
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:构建工业 Simulink 模型基准,系统比较模型测试与模型检测发现需求违规的能力,并给出二者互补与联合使用指南。

Matlab/Simulink 被信息物理系统工业广泛用于动态系统建模,但其需求违规验证常依赖模型测试与模型检测两类主流方法;二者在真实工业模型上的适用性、强弱及互补性尚缺乏系统评估。本文提出一个工业 Simulink 模型基准,对其中模型类型进行分类,总结需求中反复出现的逻辑模式,并分别应用模型测试和模型检测来发现需求违规。基于结果,论文分析了两类方法的优势与局限,表明它们具有互补性:结合使用可显著提升单独方法的能力,并进一步给出如何协同应用两类方法的实践指南。

问题
如何有效发现工业 Simulink/CPS 模型中的需求违规,以及模型测试与模型检测在此类模型上的相对优势和局限是什么。
方法
作者构建工业 Simulink 模型基准,对模型类型和需求逻辑模式进行分类,并分别用模型测试与模型检测在基准上查找需求违规。
评估
通过基准实验结果比较两类方法的强弱与互补性,并据此总结协同使用指南。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Matlab/Simulink is a development and simulation language that is widely used by the Cyber-Physical System (CPS) industry to model dynamical systems. There are two mainstream approaches to verify CPS Simulink models: model testing that attempts to identify failures in models by executing them for a number of sampled test inputs, and model checking that attempts to exhaustively check the correctness of models against some given formal properties. In this paper, we present an industrial Simulink model benchmark, provide a categorization of different model types in the benchmark, describe the recurring logical patterns in the model requirements, and discuss the results of applying model checking and model testing approaches to identify requirements violations in the benchmarked models. Based on the results, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of model testing and model checking. Our results further suggest that model checking and model testing are complementary and by combining them, we can significantly enhance the capabilities of each of these approaches individually. We conclude by providing guidelines as to how the two approaches can be best applied together.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot5051,
  title = {Evaluating model testing and model checking for finding requirements violations in Simulink models},
  author = {Shiva Nejati and Khouloud Gaaloul and Claudio Menghi and Lionel C. Briand and Stephen Foster and David Wolfe},
  booktitle = {FSE},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.1145/3338906.3340444}
}