一句话:实证表明文本算法提取的情绪动态常无法反映自报真实情绪动态,团队层面匹配更好。
论文关注软件工程研究中广泛使用的文本情绪识别:研究者常从沟通记录中抽取情绪状态,却缺乏其与真实情绪一致性的系统检验。作者对27个项目团队、82名成员开展为期一年的多层级纵向实证研究,按周收集成员自报的回顾性情绪,同时从文本沟通记录中抽取对应情绪,并用多种统计与时间序列方法建模比较两类情绪动态。结果表明,基于文本算法抽取的情绪动态往往不能很好反映自报回顾性情绪动态;在团队层面两者匹配度更高;个人性格与团队情绪表达规范显著影响匹配/失配。研究提醒社区注意在SE研究中应用文本情绪识别工具的局限与挑战。
Emotion awareness research in SE context has been growing in recent years. Currently, researchers often rely on textual communication records to extract emotion states using natural language processing techniques. However, how well these extracted emotion states reflect people's real emotions has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we report a multi-level, longitudinal empirical study with 82 individual members in 27 project teams. We collected their self-reported retrospective emotion states on a weekly basis during their year-long projects and also extracted corresponding emotions from the textual communication records. We then model and compare the dynamics of these two types of emotions using multiple statistical and time series analysis methods. Our analyses yield a rich set of findings. The most important one is that the dynamics of emotions extracted using text-based algorithms often do not well reflect the dynamics of self-reported retrospective emotions. Besides, the extracted emotions match self-reported retrospective emotions better at the team-level. Our results also suggest that individual personalities and the team's emotion display norms significantly impact the match/mismatch. Our results should warn the research community about the limitations and challenges of applying text-based emotion recognition tools in SE research.
DOI 原文 ·
@inproceedings{paperbot5252,
title = {Emotions Extracted from Text vs. True Emotions–An Empirical Evaluation in SE Context},
author = {Yi Wang},
booktitle = {ASE},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.1109/ase.2019.00031}
}