paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Automating App Review Response Generation

自动化应用评论回复生成
ASE 2019 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)2019匹配度 1/10 · 该论文属于软件工程与自然语言处理交叉中的应用评论自动回复生成,核心是监督学习文本生成,不涉及程序分析、静态分析、形式化验证、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析,也与 LLM/Agent 用于 PL 或 PL 用于 AI 系统的方向无关。引用 42 inbox
Cuiyun Gao, Jichuan Zeng, Xin Xia, David Lo, Michael R. Lyu, Irwin King
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 RRGen,通过监督学习建模评论与回复之间的知识关联,自动为应用用户评论生成回复。

已有研究表明,回复用户评论通常能提升用户给出的评分,Hassan 等人甚至发现回复可使评分被修改的概率提高到不回复时的六倍。然而开发者每天面对海量用户评论,逐条阅读并回复负担沉重,现有做法多依赖模板,表达感谢或提示公司邮箱,缺乏针对性与自动化程度。为此,本文提出 RRGen 方法,通过从训练数据中监督地学习评论文本与对应回复之间的知识关联来自动生成回复,并显式引入用户评分、评论长度等评论属性作为额外信息。作者在 58 个应用、309,246 对评论—回复数据上开展实验,结果显示 RRGen 在 BLEU-4 指标上至少优于基线 67.4%,定性分析也表明其生成的回复更相关、更准确。

问题
开发者需要回复大量用户评论以提升评分,但人工阅读并撰写回复成本极高,而模板式回复缺乏针对性,因此需要自动生成评论回复的方法。
方法
提出 RRGen,以监督方式学习评论与其回复之间的知识关系,并显式融入用户评分、评论长度等评论属性来生成回复。
评估
在涵盖 58 个应用的 309,246 对评论—回复数据上进行实验,以 BLEU-4 为主要指标与基线对比,并辅以定性分析验证回复的相关性与准确性。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Previous studies showed that replying to a user review usually has a positive effect on the rating that is given by the user to the app. For example, Hassan et al. found that responding to a review increases the chances of a user updating their given rating by up to six times compared to not responding. To alleviate the labor burden in replying to the bulk of user reviews, developers usually adopt a template-based strategy where the templates can express appreciation for using the app or mention the company email address for users to follow up. However, reading a large number of user reviews every day is not an easy task for developers. Thus, there is a need for more automation to help developers respond to user reviews. Addressing the aforementioned need, in this work we propose a novel approach RRGen that automatically generates review responses by learning knowledge relations between reviews and their responses. RRGen explicitly incorporates review attributes, such as user rating and review length, and learns the relations between reviews and corresponding responses in a supervised way from the available training data. Experiments on 58 apps and 309,246 review-response pairs highlight that RRGen outperforms the baselines by at least 67.4% in terms of BLEU-4 (an accuracy measure that is widely used to evaluate dialogue response generation systems). Qualitative analysis also confirms the effectiveness of RRGen in generating relevant and accurate responses.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot5322,
  title = {Automating App Review Response Generation},
  author = {Cuiyun Gao and Jichuan Zeng and Xin Xia and David Lo and Michael R. Lyu and Irwin King},
  booktitle = {ASE},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.1109/ase.2019.00025}
}