paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Gap between theory and practice

理论与实践之间的差距
ICSE Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering2020匹配度 3/10 · 论文关注智能合约安全中静态分析与形式化验证工具在学术研究与工业实践之间的差距,属于程序分析与验证的应用/实证研究,与用户对程序分析的兴趣有间接关联;但未涉及用户核心关注的 LLM/Agent 与静态分析交叉、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析,区块链安全也非其列出的主要方向。引用 23 inbox
Sungjae Hwang, Sukyoung Ryu
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:指出现有智能合约安全研究虽多,但其是否真正提升现实中合约安全性仍不明确。

以太坊等区块链平台通过智能合约支持支付、拍卖等金融交易。学术界对智能合约安全高度关注,报告了多种安全漏洞,并开发静态分析工具与验证框架来检测漏洞。然而,目前仍不清楚学术界这些大量努力是否确实提升了现实中智能合约的安全性。本文以此为核心问题,关注智能合约安全研究与实际部署之间的差距。摘要未提供具体研究方法、评估对象或关键结果,因此只能确定其问题意识:需要实证检验学术工具与真实合约安全之间的关系。

问题
学术界已提出多种智能合约漏洞、静态分析工具与验证框架,但这些成果是否真正提升了现实以太坊智能合约的安全性尚不明确。
方法
摘要未说明具体方法;从标题与摘要可推断论文关注理论与实践差距的考察,但无具体方法信息。
评估
摘要未给出评估方式或结果。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Ethereum, one of the most popular blockchain platforms, provides financial transactions like payments and auctions through smart contracts. Due to the immense interest in smart contracts in academia, the research community of smart contract security has made a significant improvement recently. Researchers have reported various security vulnerabilities in smart contracts, and developed static analysis tools and verification frameworks to detect them. However, it is unclear whether such great efforts from academia has indeed enhanced the security of smart contracts in reality.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot5642,
  title = {Gap between theory and practice},
  author = {Sungjae Hwang and Sukyoung Ryu},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2020},
  doi = {10.1145/3377811.3380424}
}