paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 White-box fairness testing through adversarial sampling

通过对抗采样的白盒公平性测试
ICSE Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering2020匹配度 2/10 · 该论文研究 DNN 公平性测试与对抗采样,属于机器学习测试/公平性方向;与用户画像核心关注的 PL→AI 静态分析、Agentic/LLM 程序分析、浮点程序分析和贝叶斯程序分析均无直接关联。仅与“机器学习系统分析”存在非常微弱的交集,但方法和目标不匹配。引用 129 inbox
Peixin Zhang, Jingyi Wang, Jun Sun, Guoliang Dong, Xinyu Wang, Xingen Wang, Jin Song Dong, Ting Dai
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出基于对抗采样的可扩展白盒公平性测试方法,高效搜索 DNN 的个体歧视实例。

深度神经网络(DNN)在许多任务上表现优异,但在具有社会影响的应用中,其公平性(即非歧视性)仍令人担忧。本文关注如何搜索 DNN 的个体歧视实例,以支撑公平性测试。作者提出一种可扩展的白盒方法,通过对抗采样进行搜索,仅依赖梯度计算和聚类等轻量级过程,因此比现有方法更易扩展。实验与当前最优方法比较,该方法对搜索空间的探索效果提升约 9 倍,生成的个体歧视实例数量提升约 25 倍,同时耗时仅为后者的二分之一到七分之一。

问题
DNN 的公平性(非歧视)测试需要高效找到个体歧视实例,但现有方法可扩展性不足。
方法
提出白盒对抗采样方法,利用梯度计算和聚类等轻量过程搜索个体歧视实例。
评估
与 SOTA 方法对比,搜索空间探索提升 9 倍,生成歧视实例提升 25 倍,耗时降至 1/2 到 1/7。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Although deep neural networks (DNNs) have demonstrated astonishing performance in many applications, there are still concerns on their dependability. One desirable property of DNN for applications with societal impact is fairness (i.e., non-discrimination). In this work, we propose a scalable approach for searching individual discriminatory instances of DNN. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, our approach only employs lightweight procedures like gradient computation and clustering, which makes it significantly more scalable than existing methods. Experimental results show that our approach explores the search space more effectively (9 times) and generates much more individual discriminatory instances (25 times) using much less time (half to 1/7).

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot5648,
  title = {White-box fairness testing through adversarial sampling},
  author = {Peixin Zhang and Jingyi Wang and Jun Sun and Guoliang Dong and Xinyu Wang and Xingen Wang and Jin Song Dong and Ting Dai},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2020},
  doi = {10.1145/3377811.3380331}
}