paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Responsibility and verification: Importance value in temporal logics

责任与验证:时序逻辑中的重要性值
LICS 2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)2021匹配度 3/10 · 该论文属于形式验证/模型检测的理论工作,将 Shapley 值用于时序逻辑重要性度量并给出复杂度界,但与用户核心关注的 LLM/Agent 与静态分析/形式化验证交叉、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析均无直接关联,也未涉及工业落地或 LLM/Agent 工具。引用 1 inbox
Corto Mascle, Christel Baier, Florian Funke, Simon Jantsch, Stefan Kiefer
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:将 Shapley 值引入模型检测,度量系统组件对满足时序规约的重要性,并给出线性与分支时序逻辑下的复杂度上下界。

本文关注如何度量系统某一部分的非确定性选择对其满足给定规约的能力的影响。为此,作者将 Shapley 值的思想应用于验证:把某个组件的控制权单独或与其他组件一起交给对手,再检验系统是否仍能满足规约,从而定义该组件的重要性。论文在模型检测框架下研究这一概念,覆盖多种经典线性时序规约,并提出若干将其推广到分支时序规约的方式。针对这些定义,作者在几乎所有情形下给出了紧的复杂度界,刻画了计算组件重要性值的理论代价。

问题
如何衡量系统中某一部分的非确定性选择对于系统满足时序规约究竟有多重要。
方法
将 Shapley 值引入模型检测,通过把组件控制权单独或联合交给对手并检验规约是否仍可满足来定义重要性,并扩展到分支时序规约。
评估
在模型检测框架下对多种线性与分支时序规约进行理论复杂度分析,在几乎所有情形给出紧的复杂度上下界。
原文摘要(Abstract)

We aim at measuring the influence of the nondeterministic choices of a part of a system on its ability to satisfy a specification. For this purpose, we apply the concept of Shapley values to verification as a means to evaluate how important a part of a system is. The importance of a component is measured by giving its control to an adversary, alone or along with other components, and testing whether the system can still fulfill the specification. We study this idea in the framework of model-checking with various classical types of linear-time specification, and propose several ways to transpose it to branching ones. We also provide tight complexity bounds in almost every case.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot6182,
  title = {Responsibility and verification: Importance value in temporal logics},
  author = {Corto Mascle and Christel Baier and Florian Funke and Simon Jantsch and Stefan Kiefer},
  booktitle = {LICS},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.1109/lics52264.2021.9470597}
}