Since the beginning of the theory of computation, researchers have been fascinated by the prospect of proving impossibility results on computing. When and how can we argue that a task cannot be efficiently solved, no matter what algorithm we try to use?In this short article, I will briefly introduce some of the ideas behind a research program in computational complexity that I and others have studied, for the last decade. (The accompanying talk will contain more details.) The program begins with the observations that:(a) Computer scientists know a great deal about how to design efficient algorithms.(b) However, we do not know how to prove many weak-looking complexity lower bounds.It turns out that certain knowledge we have from (a) can be leveraged to prove complexity lower bounds in a systematic way, making progress on (b). For example, progress on faster circuit satisfiability algorithms (even those that barely improve upon exhaustive search) automatically imply circuit complexity lower bounds for interesting functions1.

@inproceedings{paperbot6211,
  title = {Complexity Lower Bounds from Algorithm Design},
  author = {R. Ryan Williams},
  booktitle = {LICS},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.1109/lics52264.2021.9470522}
}