一句话：利用综合量规让大规模IT学生互评用户中心概念设计，发现学生评审接近研究者评审，并能及时提供反馈与促进反思。
概念设计常决定产品开发方向，因此让软件工程与信息技术学生在该阶段考虑用户需求很重要，但大规模班级的概念设计评估耗时且资源不足。本文提出一套面向大班的教学、捕获与评估概念设计制品的方法。在两项研究中，超过185名本科IT学生使用综合评分量规互评同伴的设计制品，随后两名研究者用同一量规复核。结果显示，学生同伴评审与研究者评审接近，且能够及时向学生提供有价值的反馈并促使其反思；同时，教师评估因资源不足不可行。结论是，在综合量规指导下，同伴评审可用于大班概念设计的评估与及时反馈。
Conceptual design often sets the direction of the development of a product. Educating Software Engineering and Information Technology (IT) students to consider the needs of users during the conceptual design stage is important. The assessment of conceptual design is a time consuming process. When budgets are limited, financial resources are inadequately allocated to allow staff to spend quality time assessing the conceptual design artifacts of large classes. We present a methodology to teach, capture and evaluate conceptual design artifacts for large classes. In two separate studies, two groups of over 185 undergraduate IT students reviewed their peers' design artifacts using a comprehensive rubric. Their reviews were later checked by two researchers using the same rubric. It was found that not only were the student-peers' reviews close to the researchers' reviews, it was possible to give students valuable and timely feedback and scaffold them to reflect, an essential characteristic for professional competence. In addition, we found that assessment by staff was not feasible due to inadequate resources. We conclude that for large classes, conceptual design artifacts can be evaluated and valuable feedback provided in a timely manner by peers with the guidance of a comprehensive rubric.
DOI 原文 ·
@inproceedings{paperbot6283,
title = {Effectiveness of Peer Review in Teaching and Learning User Centered Conceptual Design Among Large Cohorts of Information Technology Students},
author = {Farshid Anvari and Hien Minh Thi Tran and Deborah Richards},
booktitle = {ICSE},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1109/icse-seet52601.2021.00016}
}