一句话:提出因果公平方法,度量ML流水线数据预处理阶段的公平性及其组合效应,并识别公平模式。
近年来机器学习模型在种族、性别、年龄等方面表现出歧视。已有公平性研究大多关注单一分类器预测任务,却较少考察机器学习流水线中数据预处理阶段的公平性影响;且不公平的根源常被认为在数据本身,但尚无研究度量特定数据转换所造成的不公平。本文引入因果公平方法,用以推理ML流水线中数据预处理阶段的公平性影响,并利用已有指标定义各阶段的公平性度量。作者对来自三个不同来源的37条流水线中的预处理阶段进行了详细公平性评估,发现某些数据转换器会导致模型表现出不公平,并归纳出多类数据转换器的公平性模式。最后,论文展示了一个预处理阶段的局部公平性如何组合为流水线的全局公平性,并利用该组合关系选择下游转换器以缓解机器学习流水线中的不公平。
In recent years, many incidents have been reported where machine learning models exhibited discrimination among people based on race, sex, age, etc. Research has been conducted to measure and mitigate unfairness in machine learning models. For a machine learning task, it is a common practice to build a pipeline that includes an ordered set of data preprocessing stages followed by a classifier. However, most of the research on fairness has considered a single classifier based prediction task. What are the fairness impacts of the preprocessing stages in machine learning pipeline? Furthermore, studies showed that often the root cause of unfairness is ingrained in the data itself, rather than the model. But no research has been conducted to measure the unfairness caused by a specific transformation made in the data preprocessing stage. In this paper, we introduced the causal method of fairness to reason about the fairness impact of data preprocessing stages in ML pipeline. We leveraged existing metrics to define the fairness measures of the stages. Then we conducted a detailed fairness evaluation of the preprocessing stages in 37 pipelines collected from three different sources. Our results show that certain data transformers are causing the model to exhibit unfairness. We identified a number of fairness patterns in several categories of data transformers. Finally, we showed how the local fairness of a preprocessing stage composes in the global fairness of the pipeline. We used the fairness composition to choose appropriate downstream transformer that mitigates unfairness in the machine learning pipeline.