paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Detecting Adversarial Samples with Graph-Guided Testing

基于图引导测试的对抗样本检测
ASE 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)2021匹配度 2/10 · 该论文研究 DNN 对抗样本检测中的模型变异测试与图引导剪枝,属于软件测试与机器学习交叉,但未涉及用户核心方向中的静态分析、Agentic 程序、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析,也未使用 LLM/Agent 改进分析。引用 0 inbox
Zuohui Chen, Renxuan Wang, Jingyang Xiang, Yue Yu, Xin Xia, Shouling Ji, Qi Xuan, Xiaoniu Yang
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出图引导测试 GGT,通过图特征生成高多样性剪枝模型,高效检测 DNN 对抗样本。

深度神经网络易受对抗样本攻击,检测对抗样本对模型应用至关重要。已有软件测试方法中的模型变异测试(MMT)能检测多种对抗样本,但其变异模型数量庞大(常超过 100 个)且缺乏多样性,容易被高置信度对抗样本规避,效率和效果均受限。本文提出图引导测试(Graph-Guided Testing, GGT),在图特征指导下生成剪枝模型,每个模型仅约 MMT 变异模型 5% 的参数,且图引导模型具有更高多样性。在 CIFAR10 上的初步实验表明,GGT 在检测效果和效率上均显著优于 MMT。

问题
DNN 易受对抗样本攻击,而现有 MMT 检测方法因变异模型数量多、多样性不足,难以高效检测高置信度对抗样本。
方法
提出 GGT,依据图特征生成剪枝模型,并用这些参数量仅约 5% 且多样性更高的模型进行对抗样本检测。
评估
在 CIFAR10 上进行初步实验,对比 MMT,验证 GGT 在检测效果和效率上的优势。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial samples, the detection of which is crucial for the wide application of these DNN models. Recently, a number of deep testing methods in software engineering were proposed to find the vulnerability of DNN systems, and one of them, i.e., Model Mutation Testing (MMT), was used to successfully detect various adversarial samples generated by different kinds of adversarial attacks. However, the mutated models in MMT are always huge in number (e.g., over 100 models) and lack diversity (e.g., can be easily circumvented by high-confidence adversarial samples), which makes it less efficient in real applications and less effective in detecting high-confidence adversarial samples. In this study, we propose Graph-Guided Testing (GGT) for adversarial sample detection to overcome these aforementioned challenges. GGT generates pruned models with the guide of graph characteristics, each of them has only about 5% parameters of the mutated model in MMT, and graph guided models have higher diversity. The initial experiments on CIFAR10 validate that GGT performs much better than MMT with respect to both effectiveness and efficiency.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot6609,
  title = {Detecting Adversarial Samples with Graph-Guided Testing},
  author = {Zuohui Chen and Renxuan Wang and Jingyang Xiang and Yue Yu and Xin Xia and Shouling Ji and Qi Xuan and Xiaoniu Yang},
  booktitle = {ASE},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.1109/ase51524.2021.9678732}
}