paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Cyclic Implicit Complexity

循环隐式复杂度
LICS Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science2022匹配度 1/10 · 论文属于循环证明与隐式计算复杂度的纯证明论/逻辑研究,未涉及 LLM/Agent、静态分析、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析,与当前研究画像无直接交叉。引用 10 inbox
Gianluca Curzi, Anupam Das
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12arxiv: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:通过基于 safe-normal 函数代数的循环证明系统,用证明论约束刻画多项式时间与初等可计算函数,连接循环证明与隐式计算复杂度。

循环证明近年来受到关注,并被提议作为研究(共)归纳推理的替代框架,也催生了一些基于循环推理的类型系统;但其复杂性理论层面尚不清楚,其循环结构比常见递归模式更复杂。本文将循环证明与隐式计算复杂度(ICC)联系起来:在 Bellantoni 与 Cook 的 safe-normal 函数代数基础上引入一个循环证明系统,并借鉴 ICC 给出证明论约束,用以刻画多项式时间可计算函数与初等可计算函数。作为副产品,还得到这些函数类的新递归论隐式刻画。工作以证明论/递归论分析为主,未涉及实现或实验评估。

问题
循环证明的复杂性理论性质尚不明确,尤其是其非典型循环结构如何对应隐式计算复杂度类。
方法
基于 Bellantoni-Cook 的 safe-normal 函数代数构造循环证明系统,并施加受 ICC 启发的证明论约束。
评估
通过证明论与递归论论证,证明所给约束恰好刻画多项式时间与初等可计算函数,并导出新的隐式刻画。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Circular (or cyclic) proofs have received increasing attention in recent years, and have been proposed as an alternative setting for studying (co)inductive reasoning. In particular, now several type systems based on circular reasoning have been proposed. However, little is known about the complexity theoretic aspects of circular proofs, which exhibit sophisticated loop structures atypical of more common ‘recursion schemes’. This paper attempts to bridge the gap between circular proofs and implicit computational complexity (ICC). Namely we introduce a circular proof system based on Bellantoni and Cook’s famous safe-normal function algebra, and we identify proof theoretical constraints, inspired by ICC, to characterise the polynomial-time and elementary computable functions. Along the way we introduce new recursion theoretic implicit characterisations of these classes that may be of interest in their own right.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{abs-2110-01114,
  title = {Cyclic Implicit Complexity},
  author = {Gianluca Curzi and Anupam Das},
  booktitle = {LICS},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.1145/3531130.3533340}
}