paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 BugListener

BugListener:从社区实时聊天中识别与合成缺陷报告
ICSE Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering2022匹配度 2/10 · 该论文将神经网络与迁移学习用于从社区实时聊天中识别和合成缺陷报告,属于机器学习辅助软件工程/调试,与用户关注的静态分析、Agentic 程序分析、浮点程序分析、贝叶斯程序分析及 LLM/Agent 与形式化验证的交叉均无直接关系。其问题场景是聊天日志中的缺陷报告生成,不涉及静态分析理论、程序验证或工业级分析工具落地。引用 9 inbox
Lin Shi, Fangwen Mu, Yumin Zhang, Ye Yang, Junjie Chen, Xiao Chen, Hanzhi Jiang, Ziyou Jiang, Qing Wang
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12arxiv: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 BugListener,用神经网络与迁移学习从社区实时聊天中识别并合成缺陷报告。

社区开发中,开发者常在实时聊天里讨论紧急缺陷,但交错且含噪的对话使缺陷知识难以准确记录。本文形式化该问题为从社区实时聊天中识别并合成缺陷报告,提出 BugListener。方法分三步:用前馈神经网络从聊天日志中解缠对话;用图神经网络结合上下文识别缺陷报告对话;用迁移学习将句子分类为观察行为、期望行为与复现步骤以合成报告。在六个开源项目上评估:缺陷报告识别平均 F1 为 77.74%,较最佳基线提升 12.96%;三类句子分类 F1 分别为 84.62%、71.46%、73.13%,提升 9.32%、12.21%、10.91%。人工评估也验证了生成报告的相关性和准确性。

问题
社区软件开发中,实时聊天常包含紧急缺陷讨论,但对话交错且噪声大,准确记录并整理为缺陷报告十分困难。
方法
BugListener 自动解缠聊天对话,用图神经网络识别缺陷报告对话,并用迁移学习将句子分类为观察行为、期望行为与复现步骤以合成报告。
评估
在六个开源项目上评估缺陷报告识别与句子分类的 F1,并与基线比较;另用人工评估验证生成报告的相关性与准确性。
原文摘要(Abstract)

In community-based software development, developers frequently rely on live-chatting to discuss emergent bugs/errors they encounter in daily development tasks. However, it remains a challenging task to accurately record such knowledge due to the noisy nature of interleaved dialogs in live chat data. In this paper, we first formulate the task of identifying and synthesizing bug reports from commu-nity live chats, and propose a novel approach, named BugListener, to address the challenges. Specifically, BugListener automates three sub-tasks: 1) Disentangle the dialogs from massive chat logs by using a Feed-Forward neural network; 2) Identify the bug-report dialogs from separated dialogs by leveraging the Graph neural net-work to learn the contextual information; 3) Synthesize the bug reports by utilizing Transfer Learning techniques to classify the sentences into: observed behaviors (OB), expected behaviors (EB), and steps to reproduce the bug (SR). BugListener is evaluated on six open source projects. The results show that: for bug report identification, BugListener achieves the average Fl of 77.74%, im-proving the best baseline by 12.96%; and for bug report synthesis task, BugListener could classify the OB, EB, and SR sentences with the F1 of 84.62%, 71.46%, and 73.13%, improving the best baselines by 9.32%,12.21%,10.91%, respectively. A human evaluation study also confirms the effectiveness of Bug Listener in generating relevant and accurate bug reports. These demonstrate the significant potential of applying BugListener in community-based software development, for promoting bug discovery and quality improvement.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{abs-2204-09368,
  title = {BugListener},
  author = {Lin Shi and Fangwen Mu and Yumin Zhang and Ye Yang and Junjie Chen and Xiao Chen and Hanzhi Jiang and Ziyou Jiang and Qing Wang},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.1145/3510003.3510108}
}