paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Lighting up supervised learning in user review-based code localization: dataset and benchmark

点亮用户评论驱动的代码定位中的监督学习:数据集与基准
FSE Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering2022匹配度 2/10 · 该论文属于软件工程中用户评论驱动的代码定位任务,核心是构建数据集并对比监督/无监督方法,并未涉及静态分析、Agentic 程序、浮点程序分析、贝叶斯程序分析或 LLM/Agent 与程序分析的交叉。虽然包含数据集与基准建设,但任务方向与用户研究画像核心不匹配。引用 6 inbox
Xinwen Hu, Yu Guo, Jianjie Lu, Zheling Zhu, Chuanyi Li, Jidong Ge, Liguo Huang, Bin Luo
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:构建大规模人工标注的用户评论-代码配对数据集,并建立监督式 Review2Code 基准以对比监督与无监督方法。

移动应用的用户评论(UR)能为应用的维护与演化提供有价值反馈,因此如何更高效地利用用户评论来缩短发布周期成为软件工程社区关注的问题,其中「基于用户评论的代码定位」(Review2Code)被提出并深入研究。然而,由于缺乏大规模的真实配对(ground truth)数据集,现有方法全部基于无监督学习,监督式方法难以施展。为点亮由大规模标注数据驱动的监督学习路径,本文首先构建了一个大规模人工标注的真实配对数据集,并详细描述了标注流程与统计分析;随后在该数据集之上搭建了一个基准,包含两个当前最优的无监督 Review2Code 方法与四个监督式 Review2Code 方法,用于系统比较两类方法的性能。作者希望该工作能为监督式 Review2Code 方案的深入探索提供基础。

问题
Review2Code 任务缺乏大规模人工标注的真实「用户评论-代码」配对数据,导致现有方法只能采用无监督学习,无法评估和利用监督式方法。
方法
构建大规模人工标注的 Review2Code 真实配对数据集(含标注流程说明与统计分析),并在该数据集上建立包含 2 个 SOTA 无监督方法与 4 个监督式方法的基准。
评估
在新构建的人工标注数据集上运行并对比 2 种无监督与 4 种监督式 Review2Code 方法,考察监督式方法的性能表现及其与无监督方法的差异。
原文摘要(Abstract)

As User Reviews (URs) of mobile Apps are proven to provide valuable feedback for maintaining and evolving applications, how to make full use of URs more efficiently in the release cycle of mobile Apps has become a widely concerned and researched topic in the Software Engineering (SE) community. In order to speed up the completion of coding work related to URs to shorten the release cycle as much as possible, the task of User Review-based code localization is proposed and studied in depth. However, due to the lack of large-scale ground truth dataset (i.e., truly related pairs), existing methods are all unsupervised learning-based. In order to light up supervised learning approaches, which are driven by large labeled datasets, for Review2Code, and to compare their performances with unsupervised learning-based methods, we first introduce a large-scale human-labeled ground truth dataset, including the annotation process and statistical analysis. Then, a benchmark consisting of two SOTA unsupervised learning-based and four supervised learning-based Review2Code methods is constructed based on this dataset. We believe that this paper can provide a basis for in-depth exploration of the supervised learning-based Review2Code solutions.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot7102,
  title = {Lighting up supervised learning in user review-based code localization: dataset and benchmark},
  author = {Xinwen Hu and Yu Guo and Jianjie Lu and Zheling Zhu and Chuanyi Li and Jidong Ge and Liguo Huang and Bin Luo},
  booktitle = {FSE},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.1145/3540250.3549141}
}