paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Relational $\star$-Liftings for Differential Privacy

面向差分隐私的关系 ⋆-提升
LMCS vol.Volume 15, Issue 42019匹配度 2/10 · 该论文属于程序语言理论中的形式语义与差分隐私近似 lifting,虽与形式化验证相关,但未涉及用户关注的 LLM/Agent、静态分析、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析等核心方向,匹配度很低。引用 0 inbox
Gilles Barthe, Thomas Espitau, Justin Hsu, Tetsuya Sato, Pierre-Yves Strub
crossref: 2026-09-10

AI 速览

一句话:提出存在式 ⋆-lifting,统一近似 lifting 概念,并证明其与 Sato 构造在离散概率测度下等价。

差分隐私的形式验证中,近似 lifting(近似 coupling)是一种组合式抽象,但既有定义分为存在式 witness 与 Sato 的全称量化两类:前者组合定理更精确,后者更一般。本文提出一种新的存在式近似 lifting,称为 ⋆-lifting,并证明其在离散概率测度下与 Sato 构造等价。该结果统一了已知的近似 lifting 概念,澄清了不同定义之间的关系,并给出更清晰的性质、更一般的构造和更精确的组合定理;作者还讨论了基于 f-散度的更一般近似 lifting,从而支持更丰富的差分隐私证明。

问题
如何统一差分隐私验证中近似 lifting 的存在式定义与 Sato 的全称式定义,并兼得一般性与精确组合性?
方法
提出新的存在式近似 lifting,称为 ⋆-lifting;在离散概率测度下证明其与 Sato 构造等价,并讨论基于 f-散度的推广。
评估
通过数学证明(等价性、组合定理)和与已有定义的比较进行评估,而非实验评估;结果表明可获得更精确的组合定理和更丰富的差分隐私证明。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Recent developments in formal verification have identified approximate liftings (also known as approximate couplings) as a clean, compositional abstraction for proving differential privacy. This construction can be defined in two styles. Earlier definitions require the existence of one or more witness distributions, while a recent definition by Sato uses universal quantification over all sets of samples. These notions have each have their own strengths: the universal version is more general than the existential ones, while existential liftings are known to satisfy more precise composition principles. We propose a novel, existential version of approximate lifting, called $\star$-lifting, and show that it is equivalent to Sato's construction for discrete probability measures. Our work unifies all known notions of approximate lifting, yielding cleaner properties, more general constructions, and more precise composition theorems for both styles of lifting, enabling richer proofs of differential privacy. We also clarify the relation between existing definitions of approximate lifting, and consider more general approximate liftings based on $f$-divergences.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@article{paperbot734,
  title = {Relational $\star$-Liftings for Differential Privacy},
  author = {Gilles Barthe and Thomas Espitau and Justin Hsu and Tetsuya Sato and Pierre-Yves Strub},
  journal = {Logical Methods in Computer Science},
  volume = {Volume 15, Issue 4},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.23638/lmcs-15(4:18)2019}
}