paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 The Data Complexity of Ontology-Mediated Queries with Closed Predicates

带封闭谓词的本体中介查询的数据复杂度
LMCS vol.Volume 15, Issue 32019匹配度 1/10 · 该论文研究描述逻辑本体中介查询的数据复杂度,属于逻辑与知识表示的理论工作,不涉及 LLM/Agent、静态分析、浮点或贝叶斯程序分析,与用户核心研究方向没有交集。引用 14 inbox
Carsten Lutz, Inanc Seylan, Frank Wolter
crossref: 2026-09-10

AI 速览

一句话:对带封闭谓词的本体中介查询进行数据复杂度分类,在DL-Lite、EL与ALCHI中建立可处理与不可处理边界。

本文研究描述逻辑本体中介查询中,部分谓词可被封闭(OMQC)时的数据复杂度。作者采用非一致性分析,对轻量级 DL-Lite、EL 及表达力较强的 ALCHI 本体给出可处理与不可处理的分类。本体层面:DL-Lite 呈现 FO 可重写与 coNP 完全之间的二分,EL 呈现 PTime 与 coNP 完全之间的二分,判定可处理性的元问题属于 PTime。OMQC 层面:若概念名和角色名均可封闭,则不存在二分(除非 NP=PTime);若只封闭概念名,查询求值复杂度与满射 CSP 复杂度紧密关联。还识别出一类基于 DL-Lite 本体的 OMQC 保证可处理甚至 FO 可重写。

问题
研究在描述逻辑本体中介查询中允许封闭选定谓词时,查询求值的数据复杂度,并对哪些本体/查询组合可处理进行分类。
方法
对 DL-Lite、EL、ALCHI 进行非一致性复杂度分析,通过归约与二分定理,将 OMQC 求值复杂度联系到满射 CSP,并分析判定可处理性的元问题。
评估
以理论证明给出复杂度二分与元问题复杂度界,并识别出一类 DL-Lite 上保证可处理甚至 FO 可重写的 OMQC。
原文摘要(Abstract)

In the context of ontology-mediated querying with description logics (DLs), we study the data complexity of queries in which selected predicates can be closed (OMQCs). We provide a non-uniform analysis, aiming at a classification of the complexity into tractable and non-tractable for ontologies in the lightweight DLs DL-Lite and EL, and the expressive DL ALCHI. At the level of ontologies, we prove a dichotomy between FO-rewritable and coNP-complete for DL-Lite and between PTime and coNP-complete for EL. The meta problem of deciding tractability is proved to be in PTime. At the level of OMQCs, we show that there is no dichotomy (unless NP equals PTime) if both concept and role names can be closed. If only concept names can be closed, we tightly link the complexity of query evaluation to the complexity of surjective CSPs. We also identify a class of OMQCs based on ontologies formulated in DL-Lite that are guaranteed to be tractable and even FO-rewritable.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@article{paperbot763,
  title = {The Data Complexity of Ontology-Mediated Queries with Closed Predicates},
  author = {Carsten Lutz and Inanc Seylan and Frank Wolter},
  journal = {Logical Methods in Computer Science},
  volume = {Volume 15, Issue 3},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.23638/lmcs-15(3:23)2019}
}