paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P0 Eiffel: Inferring Input Ranges of Significant Floating-point Errors via Polynomial Extrapolation

Eiffel:通过多项式外推推断显著浮点错误的输入范围
ASE 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)2023匹配度 8/10 · 该论文直接研究浮点程序分析,提出通过采样聚类与多项式外推推断浮点错误输入范围的工具,正好命中用户画像中“浮点程序分析”这一核心方向;同时问题驱动、有工程实现与多基准对比(Atomu、S³ FP、Herbie),符合偏好的论文风格。但完全不涉及 LLM/Agent,因此未覆盖用户“浮点分析×LLM”的交叉兴趣,匹配度略低于正中核心。引用 7 inbox
Zuoyan Zhang, Bei Zhou, Jiangwei Hao, Hongru Yang, Mengqi Cui, Yuchang Zhou, Guanghui Song, Fei Li, Jinchen Xu, Jie Zhao
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 Eiffel,用采样聚类与多项式外推推断浮点错误的输入范围,提升误差分析适用性。

现有用于查找导致显著浮点误差的输入值或覆盖这些值的小范围的搜索启发式方法限制较多,难以实现且通用性受限。本文提出误差分析工具 Eiffel,将目标从“搜索”转为“推断”错误诱发输入范围。给定浮点表达式及其定义域 D,Eiffel 先在较小域 R 上采样构造误差数据集并聚类;若形成两个以上聚类,则拟合 R 中错误诱发范围边界坐标的多项式曲线,并外推到 D 以推断所有目标范围并报告最大误差;否则直接返回 R 上的最大误差。实验表明,Eiffel 在全部 70 个基准上均检测到误差,适用性优于 Atomu 和 S³ FP,二者仅能报告部分基准的误差。将 Eiffel 推断的范围输入 Herbie 后,平均精度提升 3.35 比特,最高提升 53.3 比特。

问题
现有寻找显著浮点误差输入值或覆盖范围的方法受到严格约束,实现复杂且通用性有限。
方法
Eiffel 在较小域上采样构造误差数据集并聚类,若聚类数超过两个则拟合错误范围边界多项式并外推到完整定义域,否则返回采样域最大误差。
评估
在 70 个基准上与 Atomu 和 S³ FP 对比,Eiffel 成功检测全部基准的误差;并将推断范围用于 Herbie,取得平均 3.35 比特、最高 53.3 比特的精度提升。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Existing search heuristics used to find input values that result in significant floating-point (FP) errors or small ranges that cover them are accompanied by severe constraints, complicating their implementation and restricting their general applicability. This paper introduces an error analysis tool called Eiffel to infer error-inducing input ranges instead of searching them. Given an FP expression with its domain $\mathcal{D}$, Eiffel first constructs an error data set by sampling values across a smaller domain $\mathcal{R}$ and assembles these data into clusters. If more than two clusters are formed, Eiffel derives polynomial curves that best fit the bound coordinates of the error-inducing ranges in $\mathcal{R}$, extrapolating them to infer all target ranges of $\mathcal{D}$ and reporting the maximal error. Otherwise, Eiffel simply returns the largest error across $\mathcal{R}$. Experimental results show that Eiffel exhibits a broader applicability than Atomu and $\mathbf{S}^{3}$ FP by successfully detecting the errors of all 70 considered benchmarks while the two baselines only report errors for part of them. By taking as input the inferred ranges of Eiffel, Herbie obtains an average accuracy improvement of 3.35 bits and up to 53.3 bits.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{ZhangZHYCZSLXZ23,
  title = {Eiffel: Inferring Input Ranges of Significant Floating-point Errors via Polynomial Extrapolation},
  author = {Zuoyan Zhang and Bei Zhou and Jiangwei Hao and Hongru Yang and Mengqi Cui and Yuchang Zhou and Guanghui Song and Fei Li and Jinchen Xu and Jie Zhao},
  booktitle = {ASE},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.1109/ase56229.2023.00139}
}