paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P1 Quantitative Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks

神经网络的定量鲁棒性分析
ISSTA Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis2023匹配度 5/10 · 该论文属于程序验证与机器学习交叉,将形式化验证/静态分析思想用于神经网络鲁棒性分析,与用户PL→AI方向有一定重合;但不涉及Agentic程序、LLM、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析,因此不是研究方向核心。引用 0 inbox
Mara Downing
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:聚焦神经网络定量鲁棒性验证,旨在不仅判定邻域内是否存在误分类输入,还度量其比例并构建系列工具。

神经网络越来越多用于安全攸关场景,如交通标志识别和医学图像处理,因此对其安全性、正确性以及鲁棒性的验证至关重要。传统鲁棒性验证通常回答给定输入邻域内是否存在被误分类的输入。该研究计划将关注点推进到定量鲁棒性:不仅判断误分类输入是否存在,还要统计其数量,并给出其占邻域大小的比例。整体目标是拓展神经网络的定量鲁棒性验证研究,并开发一系列定量验证工具,以加深对神经网络鲁棒性的理解。摘要未给出具体方法细节与实验结果,属于研究愿景或博士研究计划。

问题
神经网络在安全攸关领域应用广泛,误预测可能造成灾难性后果;核心问题是验证给定输入邻域内的鲁棒性,尤其定量地刻画误分类输入的存在性与比例。
方法
作者计划围绕定量鲁棒性验证开展研究,从只判定是否存在误分类输入,扩展到统计误分类输入数量及其占邻域大小的比例,并构建多种定量验证工具。
评估
摘要未报告具体实验评估;评估目标预计通过所构建的定量验证工具来扩展对神经网络鲁棒性的理解。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Neural networks are an increasingly common tool for solving problems that require complex analysis and pattern matching, such as identifying stop signs or processing medical imagery. Accordingly, verification of neural networks for safety and correctness is of great importance, as mispredictions can have catastrophic results in safety critical domains. One metric for verification is robustness, which answers whether or not a misclassified input exists in a given input neighborhood. I am focusing my research at quantitative robustness---finding not only if there exist misclassified inputs within a given neighborhood but also how many exist as a proportion of the neighborhood size. My overall goal is to expand the research on quantitative neural network robustness verification and create a variety of quantitative verification tools geared towards expanding our understanding of neural network robustness.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{Downing23,
  title = {Quantitative Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks},
  author = {Mara Downing},
  booktitle = {ISSTA},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.1145/3597926.3605231}
}