一句话:提出项目级 Java 基准 JavaBench,系统评测 LLM 生成面向对象代码的能力,发现其远逊于本科生。
现有代码生成基准在语言、粒度与特性三方面严重失衡:95.8% 涉及 Python,仅 5 个涉及 Java;超过 83.3% 为函数/语句级,项目级基准全部限于 Python;且普遍只考察基础语法,忽略封装、继承、多态等面向对象特性。为此作者提出 JavaBench——项目级 Java 基准,含 4 个项目、106 个类、389 个方法,测试覆盖率最高达 92%,并由 282 名本科生验证,平均得分 90.93/100。评测设计覆盖三种上下文设置、两种粒度的五种合成策略与三层级指标。实验显示 LLM 在项目级 Java 编程上远落后于本科生:无任何模型能完整正确完成任一项目,宽松评估下最高 Pass@5 仅 48.24%;以方法签名作为提示上下文可取得较理想的平衡。
Code generation benchmarks such as HumanEval are widely adopted to evaluate LLMs’ capabilities. However, after consolidating the latest 24 benchmarks, we noticed three significant imbalances. First, imbalanced programming language. 95.8% of benchmarks involve Python, while only 5 benchmarks involve Java, resulting in an insufficient understanding of LLMs’ capability to generate Java code. Second, imbalanced code granularity. Function-/statement-level benchmarks account for over 83.3% of benchmarks. Only a mere handful extends to class-/project-levels, and all are limited to Python. Third, lacking advanced features. Existing benchmarks primarily assess basic coding skills (e.g., variables, operators, and control structures), while overlooking advanced Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) features (i.e., encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism). Considering the prevalence of these advanced features in real-world Java project development, constructing benchmarks to test LLMs on handling OOP features is necessary.To fill these gaps, we propose JavaBench, a project-level Java benchmark that exercises OOP features. It comprises four Java projects with 389 methods in 106 Java classes. The test coverage is up to 92%, and JavaBench is attested by 282 undergraduate students, reaching a 90.93/100 average score (i.e., pass rate against the test suite), ensuring the quality of documentation, code skeleton, and tests. To better evaluate LLM’s capability against JavaBench, we introduce a systematic evaluation design covering three context settings and five synthesis strategies at two granularities using three hierarchical metrics. Our extensive experiment yields several interesting findings. First, we noticed that regarding project-level Java programming, LLMs are far behind undergraduate students (no project can be correctly completed by any studied LLMs, and at most 48.24% Pass@5 in a more relaxed evaluation). Second, using method signature as prompt context may strike an ideal balance for project-level code generation. JavaBench is publicly available at https://github.com/java-bench/JavaBench. We also release a leaderboard and invite model developers to participate and test their models against JavaBench at https://java-bench.github.io/leaderboard.html.CCS CONCEPTS• Software and its engineering → Automatic programming.
DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP
@inproceedings{CaoCWC024,
title = {JavaBench: A Benchmark of Object-Oriented Code Generation for Evaluating Large Language Models},
author = {Jialun Cao and Zhiyong Chen and Jiarong Wu and Shing-Chi Cheung and Chang Xu},
booktitle = {ASE},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1145/3691620.3695470}
}