paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 An Explainable Automated Model for Measuring Software Engineer Contribution

一个可解释的自动化模型:衡量软件工程师贡献
ASE Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering2024匹配度 1/10 · 论文关注软件工程师贡献度量与可解释自动化评估,属于软件工程/管理度量方向,未涉及静态分析、程序分析、浮点分析、贝叶斯程序分析或 LLM/Agent 与 PL 的交叉,与研究画像核心方向基本不匹配。引用 1 inbox
Yue Li, He Zhang, Yuzhe Jin, Zhong Ren, Liming Dong, Jun Lyu, Lanxin Yang, David Lo, Dong Shao
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出可解释的自动化模型衡量软件工程师贡献,弥补现有实践依赖同行评审、缺乏客观透明工具的不足。

软件工程师在软件开发全生命周期中至关重要,贡献测量能提供激励以提升质量与效率。然而现有研究忽视实践中的贡献测量,过度依赖同行评审,缺乏客观性与透明性;且很少有研究探索哪些度量指标在实践中有效,管理者多凭经验判断,缺少可解释的自动化工具。针对这两点不足,论文提出一个可解释的自动化模型来测量软件工程师贡献,旨在为管理者提供客观、透明的辅助决策支持。摘要未详述具体方法与评估结果,但强调模型的可解释性。

问题
现有研究忽视软件工程师贡献测量,过度依赖同行评审,且管理者凭经验判断,缺少可解释的自动化工具和有效的度量指标。
方法
论文提出一个可解释的自动化模型来测量软件工程师贡献,以提供客观、透明的辅助决策。
评估
摘要未提供具体评估细节;论文定位为可解释模型,需通过实践验证其有效性。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Software engineers play an important role throughout the software development life-cycle, particularly in industry emphasizing quality assurance and timely delivery. Contribution measurement provides proper incentives to software engineers that motivate them to continuously improve the quality and efficiency of their work. However, existing research tends to ignore contribution measurement for software engineers in practice, relying heavily on peer review and lacking objectivity and transparency. Specifically, these studies still have two weaknesses. First, a few studies explore which metrics can be useful for contribution measurement in practice. Second, managers measure the contribution of software engineers based on their experience and lack of explainable automated tools to assist them.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot8350,
  title = {An Explainable Automated Model for Measuring Software Engineer Contribution},
  author = {Yue Li and He Zhang and Yuzhe Jin and Zhong Ren and Liming Dong and Jun Lyu and Lanxin Yang and David Lo and Dong Shao},
  booktitle = {ASE},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.1145/3691620.3695071}
}