一句话：分析构建系统变更及其代码评审过程，揭示维护开销大、评审缺乏专家与工具支持的挑战。
构建系统的维护给软件开发带来可观开销，但自动化质量保证方法很少应用于构建规格，这使得同行代码评审在构建系统维护中的作用被放大。然而已有工作表明，构建系统的评审过程面临缺乏构建专家和有效工具的问题。本文围绕构建系统变更的影响展开研究，旨在理解这些变更在维护与评审中带来的挑战。研究关注构建系统变更的特性及其对评审过程的影响，并指出当前评审实践在专家资源和工具支持方面的不足。摘要未报告具体的评估结果或量化数据，但强调了构建系统维护与评审中亟待解决的问题，为后续改进评审工具和流程提供了动机。
The maintenance of build systems imposes a considerable overhead on software development. Since automated quality assurance methods are rarely applied to build specifications, the importance of the role peer code review plays in the maintenance of build systems is amplified. Yet prior work shows that the review process for build systems suffers from a lack of build experts and effective tooling.
DOI 原文 ·
@inproceedings{paperbot8375,
title = {Understanding the Implications of Changes to Build Systems},
author = {Mahtab Nejati and Mahmoud Alfadel and Shane McIntosh},
booktitle = {ASE},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1145/3691620.3695514}
}