paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Does GenAI Make Usability Testing Obsolete?

GenAI 会让可用性测试过时吗?
ICSE 2025 IEEE/ACM 47th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)2025匹配度 2/10 · 该论文属于 HCI/软件工程中的可用性测试方向,核心是用视觉语言模型预测 iOS 应用的可用性问题,与用户关注的静态分析、程序语言、浮点/Bayesian 程序分析及其与 LLM 的交叉基本无关;虽然标签含“机器学习与程序语言”“开发者工具”,且提到可检查源代码,但并未涉及对程序语义的静态分析或形式化方法。引用 10 inbox
Ali Ebrahimi Pourasad, Walid Maalej
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 UX-LLM,用大型视觉语言模型预测 iOS 应用可用性问题,并评估其能否替代传统可用性测试。

移动应用可用性影响用户体验与质量,但传统评估需投入专家与时间。本文提出 UX-LLM,一个基于大型视觉语言模型、可检查 iOS 源代码并预测可用性问题的工具。研究在两个中等复杂度开源应用上预测问题,请两位专家评估,并与传统可用性测试和专家评审对比;还对开发视障人士公交应用的学生团队进行焦点小组研究。结果显示精确率 0.61–0.66、召回率 0.35–0.38,能发现有效问题但遗漏多数。焦点小组认可其发现未知问题,但担忧工作流集成。结论:UX-LLM 不能完全替代传统评估,但可作为资源有限小团队的补充,尤其借助源代码检查发现不常见路径中的问题。

问题
移动应用可用性评估依赖传统测试与专家评审,成本较高;论文探究生成式 AI 能否预测 iOS 可用性问题并替代传统方法。
方法
提出 UX-LLM,利用大型视觉语言模型检查 iOS 源代码来预测可用性问题。
评估
在两个中等复杂度开源应用上与专家评估、传统可用性测试和专家评审对比,并对学生开发团队开展焦点小组;报告精确率 0.61–0.66、召回率 0.35–0.38。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Ensuring usability is crucial for the success of mobile apps. Usability issues can compromise user experience and negatively impact the perceived app quality. This paper presents UX-LLM, a novel tool powered by a Large Vision-Language Model that predicts usability issues in iOS apps. To evaluate the performance of UX-LLM, we predicted usability issues in two open-source apps of a medium complexity and asked two usability experts to assess the predictions. We also performed traditional usability testing and expert review for both apps and compared the results to those of UX-LLM. UX-LLM demonstrated precision ranging from 0.61 and 0.66 and recall between 0.35 and 0.38, indicating its ability to identify valid usability issues, yet failing to capture the majority of issues. Finally, we conducted a focus group with an app development team of a capstone project developing a transit app for visually impaired persons. The focus group expressed positive perceptions of UX-LLM as it identified unknown usability issues in their app. However, they also raised concerns about its integration into the development workflow, suggesting potential improvements. Our results show that UX-LLM cannot fully replace traditional usability evaluation methods but serves as a valuable supplement particularly for small teams with limited resources, to identify issues in less common user paths, due to its ability to inspect the source code.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot8790,
  title = {Does GenAI Make Usability Testing Obsolete?},
  author = {Ali Ebrahimi Pourasad and Walid Maalej},
  booktitle = {ICSE},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.1109/icse55347.2025.00138}
}