paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Teamwork Quality in Agile Capstone Courses: Insights from 790 Software Engineering Students

敏捷顶点课程中的团队合作质量:来自790名软件工程学生的洞见
FSE Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering2025匹配度 0/10 · 论文研究敏捷顶点课程中团队合作质量与团队雄心水平的关系,属于软件工程教育/团队协作实证研究,与静态分析、LLM/Agent、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析等核心方向均无关。仅在课程调整中提及ChatGPT,但并未涉及LLM/Agent方法或程序分析技术。引用 1 inbox
Camilla Kielland Lund, Idunn Stabell, Viktoria Stray, Yngve Lindsjørn
crossref: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:研究敏捷顶点课程中团队雄心水平与团队合作质量、成员成功及团队绩效的关系,并评估2024年课程调整的影响。

本文关注软件工程敏捷顶点课程中的团队协作,探讨团队雄心水平如何影响团队合作质量(TWQ)、成员成功与团队绩效。研究覆盖2022–2024三年、133个学生团队、790名学生,收集1,122份前后测问卷;三年均按雄心水平分组,2024年因ChatGPT等AI工具普及而调整课程,降低书面项目报告比重。结果显示,2022和2023年雄心水平与TWQ、成员成功和绩效正相关,高雄心团队通常协作与成果更好;但2024年低、高雄心团队差距缩小,所有团队成功更均衡。研究指出,结构化干预、优先协作与包容性比单纯按雄心组队影响更大,建议弱化按雄心分组,转而培养高质量团队合作过程,以更好对接真实敏捷环境。

问题
研究敏捷顶点课程中按雄心水平组队是否以及如何影响团队合作质量、成员成功和团队绩效,并考察2024年弱化书面报告后的变化。
方法
对2022–2024年133个团队790名学生进行前后测问卷调查,共1,122份回复,比较不同雄心分组及2024年课程结构调整前后的结果。
评估
基于三年问卷数据的相关性/分组比较,发现2022–2023雄心水平正向关联团队结果,而2024团队差距缩小、成功更均衡。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Teamwork quality (TWQ), team members' success, and team performance are critical components of effective collaboration in modern software development. As capstone courses in software engineering aim to prepare students for industry practices, understanding the factors that influence team dynamics is essential. This study investigates the relationship between team ambition levels and TWQ, team members' success, and team performance in an agile capstone course. Our study involves 133 student teams comprising 790 students across three consecutive years (2022–2024). Data collection included 1,122 responses from pre- and post-surveys. In all three years, students were grouped into teams based on ambition levels. In 2024, the course structure was changed to place less emphasis on written project reports due to the widespread adoption of AI tools like ChatGPT. The results show that ambition levels were positively correlated with TWQ, team members' success, and team performance in 2022 and 2023, with higher ambition levels generally associated with improved collaboration and outcomes. However, in 2024, there were reduced disparities between lower and higher-ambition teams, enabling more equitable success across all teams. This study highlights that while ambition levels play a role in influencing teamwork and success, structured interventions that prioritize collaboration and inclusivity have a more substantial impact. These findings suggest that moving away from ambition-based team formation and focusing on fostering high-quality teamwork processes can better prepare students for real-world agile environments.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) ·

BibTeX
@inproceedings{paperbot9068,
  title = {Teamwork Quality in Agile Capstone Courses: Insights from 790 Software Engineering Students},
  author = {Camilla Kielland Lund and Idunn Stabell and Viktoria Stray and Yngve Lindsjørn},
  booktitle = {FSE},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.1145/3696630.3727254}
}