paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Review of “Algorithm Design with Haskell” by Richard Bird and Jeremy Gibbons, Cambridge University Press, 2020.

评 Richard Bird 与 Jeremy Gibbons 的《Algorithm Design with Haskell》(Cambridge University Press, 2020)
JFP vol.302020匹配度 1/10 · 该文是《Algorithm Design with Haskell》的书评,主题为函数式算法推导与程序合成,与用户的 PL↔AI、浮点程序分析、贝叶斯程序分析及 LLM 交叉方向几乎没有直接关系。它不涉及静态分析、LLM/Agent 或相关基准,因此匹配度很低。引用 0 inbox
TORSTEN GRUST
dblp: 2026-09-10crossref: 2026-09-10

AI 速览

一句话:书评:Bird 与 Gibbons 将算法视为从函数式规约出发、可用 Haskell 系统推导的计算对象。

本文是对 Richard Bird 与 Jeremy Gibbons 所著《Algorithm Design with Haskell》的书评。传统算法教材常把经典算法呈现为数十年前定型的伪代码,而该书主张算法并非刻在石头上的成品,而是可从近乎空白的函数式规约出发、通过计算系统且优雅地推导出来的对象。书中多处推导以 solutions = filter good · candidates 或 algorithm = aggregate · test · generate 这类组合子式骨架开头,体现纯函数式算法设计风格。书评强调这种以 Haskell 为载体的计算式算法呈现,以及从规约到算法的系统推导和教学价值。

问题
传统算法教材常将经典算法呈现为固定伪代码,缺少从函数式规约出发进行系统推导的视角。
方法
该书以 Haskell 纯函数式形式,把算法作为可计算对象,从函数式规约出发,借助 filter/aggregate 等组合子式骨架推导算法。
评估
本文为书评,主要通过评述该书的推导式呈现、Haskell 风格与教学价值来评价其贡献;摘要未报告实证评估或对比实验。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Algorithms in their purely functional form. Books on algorithms are plenty. Many present classical algorithms as entities carved in stone, conceived decades ago, and typeset in framed pseudo-code boxes. Not so in the present book. Bird and Gibbons treat any algorithm as a subject of calculation, to be derived systemically and elegantly starting from an (almost) blank sheet that initially holds nothing but a functional specification. In fact, several of these calculations start out with incantations like solutions= filter good · candidates or algorithm= aggregate · test · generate

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · DBLP

BibTeX
@article{Grust20,
  title = {Review of “Algorithm Design with Haskell” by Richard Bird and Jeremy Gibbons, Cambridge University Press, 2020.},
  author = {TORSTEN GRUST},
  journal = {Journal of Functional Programming},
  volume = {30},
  year = {2020},
  doi = {10.1017/s0956796820000258}
}