一句话：批判分析安全路径规划系统，提出交叉性设计原则，主张从过度技术优化转向公平安全设计。
针对公共空间中的性别暴力与骚扰，城市安全应用和安全路径规划算法被提出作为技术回应。本文以交叉性视角批判分析现有安全路径规划系统，综合女性主义地理学、人机交互与计算机科学文献，考察其算法路径与底层数据基础设施。作者提出四项交叉性设计原则：审视数据来源、面向多元身份设计、以结构性变革为中心、重视具身社区知识。文章呼吁该领域从过度技术优化转向公平的安全设计，真正关注具有交叉身份的女性经验。评估方式为概念性与批判性文献分析，而非实证用户研究或系统实现。
Technological solutions such as urban safety applications and safe path planning algorithms have emerged to address gender-based violence and harassment in public spaces. Through an inter-sectional lens, this paper critically analyzes existing safe path planning systems, synthesizing literature from feminist geography, humancomputer interaction, and computer science to examine algorithmic approaches and underlying data infrastructures. We propose inter-sectional design principles that interrogate data sources, design for diverse identities, center structural change, and value embodied community knowledge. This work call on the field to shift from overtechnical optimization to equitable safety design that focuses on the real experiences of women with intersecting identities.