paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Topic-wise Summarization of Support Ticket Dialogue via LLM

基于 LLM 的支持工单对话按主题摘要
FSE Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering2026匹配度 1/10 · 该论文研究基于LLM的支持工单对话摘要,属于LLM文本摘要与提示引导,未涉及静态分析、Agentic程序、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析等核心方向。虽然其工业场景背景可能有一定参考价值,但整体与研究画像匹配度很低。引用 0 inbox
XiaoLei Chen, Fengrui Liu, Xiao He, Tieying Zhang, Peng Wang, Wei Wang
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:提出 DIGEST 框架,利用层次化主题引导提升零样本 LLM 对多主题支持工单对话的摘要质量。

云服务支持工单对话通常冗长、碎片化,且多个主题交织演进,造成信息过载、延迟问题解决并可能掩盖关键细节。监督式或主题感知摘要方法虽能提升连贯性,但依赖大量标注数据与重新训练,成本高且难以适应动态环境。零样本大语言模型(LLM)缓解了这些限制,但直接用于多方事件对话仍受重叠发言、焦点转移和大量噪声的挑战。为此,作者提出 DIGEST,一种面向主题的摘要框架,将层次化主题引导引入零样本 LLM 摘要。DIGEST 先进行自顶向下分割,将粗粒度线程拆解并细化为子主题,再通过自底向上聚合,把局部摘要整合为连贯叙述,同时保持各问题之间的独立性。实验结果表明,DIGEST 优于基于 LLM 的摘要基线。

问题
支持工单对话冗长碎片且多主题交织,现有监督或主题感知摘要依赖大量标注与重训练,难以适应动态环境;零样本 LLM 直接应用又受重叠发言、焦点转移和噪声影响。
方法
DIGEST 在零样本 LLM 摘要中引入层次化主题引导:先自顶向下分割粗粒度线程并细化为子主题,再自底向上聚合局部摘要为连贯叙述,并保持各问题独立。
评估
在云服务支持工单对话上与基于 LLM 的摘要基线进行实验对比,结果表明 DIGEST 的性能优于这些基线。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Ticket-driven dialogues in cloud service systems, such as those in ByteDance's Volcano Engine, are typically lengthy and fragmented. They are often interleaved across multiple evolving topics, which creates information overload, delays resolution, and risks obscuring critical details. While supervised or topic-aware summarization approaches can improve coherence, they require large annotated datasets and retraining, which are costly and poorly suited to dynamic environments. Zero-shot large language models (LLMs) alleviate these constraints, yet direct application to multi-party incident dialogues remains challenging due to overlapping voices, shifting focus, and substantial noise. To address this, we propose DIGEST, a topic-wise summarization framework that introduces hierarchical topic guidance into zero-shot LLM summarization. DIGEST first performs top-down segmentation to disentangle coarse threads and refine them into subtopics, then applies bottom-up aggregation to integrate local summaries into coherent narratives while preserving independence across issues. Experimental results demonstrate that it outperforms LLM-based summarization baselines.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{ChenLHZWW26,
  title = {Topic-wise Summarization of Support Ticket Dialogue via LLM},
  author = {XiaoLei Chen and Fengrui Liu and Xiao He and Tieying Zhang and Peng Wang and Wei Wang},
  booktitle = {FSE},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3803437.3805250}
}