paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Analysis Of Linguistic Stereotypes in Single and Multi-Agent Generative AI Architectures

单智能体与多智能体生成式AI架构中的语言刻板印象分析
FSE Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering2026匹配度 1/10 · 论文主题是 LLM 输出中的方言刻板印象与提示工程/多智能体架构的缓解效果,属于以 LLM 本身为研究目标的偏见与公平性研究,既不涉及静态分析/形式化验证在机器学习或 Agentic 程序上的应用,也不涉及浮点或贝叶斯程序分析;虽提到多智能体架构,但并非对 Agentic 程序的分析或验证。引用 0 inbox
Martina Ullasci, Marco Rondina, Riccardo Coppola, Flavio Giobergia, Riccardo Bellanca, Gabriele Mancari Pasi, Luca Prato, Federico Spinoso, Silvia Tagliente
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12arxiv: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:复现并比较提示工程与多智能体架构对LLM方言刻板印象的缓解效果。

本文研究LLM因输入方言(SAE与AAE)产生刻板印象的偏见。作者复现既有分析,定义八类提示模板覆盖姓名、职业、形容词等维度,并评估角色提示、思维链提示及生成-批判-修订多智能体架构等缓解策略。采用LLM-as-judge按1–10分评价。结果显示所有模板类别均出现SAE与AAE的刻板印象差异,形容词与职业归因最强;基线差异因模型而异,Claude Haiku最大、Phi-4 Mini最小。思维链对Claude Haiku有效,多智能体架构对所有模型均能一致缓解。作者建议公平性评估需按模型验证,并在高风险部署中引入工作流级控制。

问题
LLM输出会因输入方言产生刻板印象偏见,尤其在标准美式英语与非裔美式英语对比时更为明显。
方法
复现方言敏感刻板印象分析,设计八类提示模板,并评估角色提示、思维链提示与生成-批判-修订多智能体架构,使用LLM-as-judge按1–10分评分。
评估
在多个LLM上按模板类别比较SAE与AAE输出的偏见分数,并检验不同缓解策略的效果。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Many works in the literature show that LLM outputs exhibit discriminatory behaviour, triggering stereotype-based inferences based on the dialect in which the inputs are written. This bias has been shown to be particularly pronounced when the same inputs are provided to LLMs in Standard American English (SAE) and African-American English (AAE). In this paper, we replicate existing analyses of dialect-sensitive stereotype generation in LLM outputs and investigate the effects of mitigation strategies, including prompt engineering (role-based and Chain-Of-Thought prompting) and multi-agent architectures composed of generate-critique-revise models. We define eight prompt templates to analyse different ways in which dialect bias can manifest, such as suggested names, jobs, and adjectives for SAE or AAE speakers. We use an LLM-as-judge approach to evaluate the bias in the results, using a 1–10 scale. Our results show that stereotype-bearing differences emerge between SAE- and AAE-related outputs across all template categories, with the strongest effects observed in adjective and job attribution. Baseline disparities vary substantially by model, with the largest SAE-AAE differential observed in Claude Haiku and the smallest in Phi-4 Mini. Chain-Of-Thought prompting proved to be an effective mitigation strategy for Claude Haiku, whereas the use of a multi-agent architecture ensured consistent mitigation across all the models. These findings suggest that for intersectionality-informed software engineering, fairness evaluation should include model-specific validation of mitigation strategies, and workflow-level controls (e.g., agentic architectures involving critique models) in high-impact LLM deployments. The current results are exploratory in nature and limited in scope, but can lead to extensions and replications by increasing the dataset size and applying the procedure to different languages or dialects.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{UllasciRCGBPPST26,
  title = {Analysis Of Linguistic Stereotypes in Single and Multi-Agent Generative AI Architectures},
  author = {Martina Ullasci and Marco Rondina and Riccardo Coppola and Flavio Giobergia and Riccardo Bellanca and Gabriele Mancari Pasi and Luca Prato and Federico Spinoso and Silvia Tagliente},
  booktitle = {FSE},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3803437.3805544}
}