一句话:复现并比较提示工程与多智能体架构对LLM方言刻板印象的缓解效果。
本文研究LLM因输入方言(SAE与AAE)产生刻板印象的偏见。作者复现既有分析,定义八类提示模板覆盖姓名、职业、形容词等维度,并评估角色提示、思维链提示及生成-批判-修订多智能体架构等缓解策略。采用LLM-as-judge按1–10分评价。结果显示所有模板类别均出现SAE与AAE的刻板印象差异,形容词与职业归因最强;基线差异因模型而异,Claude Haiku最大、Phi-4 Mini最小。思维链对Claude Haiku有效,多智能体架构对所有模型均能一致缓解。作者建议公平性评估需按模型验证,并在高风险部署中引入工作流级控制。
Many works in the literature show that LLM outputs exhibit discriminatory behaviour, triggering stereotype-based inferences based on the dialect in which the inputs are written. This bias has been shown to be particularly pronounced when the same inputs are provided to LLMs in Standard American English (SAE) and African-American English (AAE). In this paper, we replicate existing analyses of dialect-sensitive stereotype generation in LLM outputs and investigate the effects of mitigation strategies, including prompt engineering (role-based and Chain-Of-Thought prompting) and multi-agent architectures composed of generate-critique-revise models. We define eight prompt templates to analyse different ways in which dialect bias can manifest, such as suggested names, jobs, and adjectives for SAE or AAE speakers. We use an LLM-as-judge approach to evaluate the bias in the results, using a 1–10 scale. Our results show that stereotype-bearing differences emerge between SAE- and AAE-related outputs across all template categories, with the strongest effects observed in adjective and job attribution. Baseline disparities vary substantially by model, with the largest SAE-AAE differential observed in Claude Haiku and the smallest in Phi-4 Mini. Chain-Of-Thought prompting proved to be an effective mitigation strategy for Claude Haiku, whereas the use of a multi-agent architecture ensured consistent mitigation across all the models. These findings suggest that for intersectionality-informed software engineering, fairness evaluation should include model-specific validation of mitigation strategies, and workflow-level controls (e.g., agentic architectures involving critique models) in high-impact LLM deployments. The current results are exploratory in nature and limited in scope, but can lead to extensions and replications by increasing the dataset size and applying the procedure to different languages or dialects.
DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP
@inproceedings{UllasciRCGBPPST26,
title = {Analysis Of Linguistic Stereotypes in Single and Multi-Agent Generative AI Architectures},
author = {Martina Ullasci and Marco Rondina and Riccardo Coppola and Flavio Giobergia and Riccardo Bellanca and Gabriele Mancari Pasi and Luca Prato and Federico Spinoso and Silvia Tagliente},
booktitle = {FSE},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1145/3803437.3805544}
}