paperbot · PL 论文追踪

全部论文 待读 收藏

P2 Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the German Software Engineering Industry: An Empirical Study

德国软件工程行业中生成式人工智能的采用:一项实证研究
FSE Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering2026匹配度 3/10 · 该论文是德国软件工程行业采用生成式AI工具的实证研究,涉及开发者工具、工业落地和组织约束,与“LLM/Agent作为工具”的工业应用有一定外围关联;但它不涉及静态分析、形式化验证、浮点程序分析或贝叶斯程序分析,也没有提出面向Agentic程序的方法或benchmark,因此与核心研究方向匹配度低。引用 2 inbox
Ludwig Felder, Tobias Eisenreich, Mahsa Fischer, Stefan Wagner, Chunyang Chen
crossref: 2026-09-12dblp: 2026-09-12arxiv: 2026-09-12

AI 速览

一句话:通过访谈与问卷揭示德国软件工程师采用生成式AI工具的动因、组织约束与经验差异。

生成式AI工具在开发者中迅速普及,但其有效使用的深层因素——交互深度、组织约束与经验差异——缺乏系统研究;在需同时应对GDPR与EU AI Act等严格监管的德国,这一议题尤为突出。本文开展混合方法实证研究:先对18位从业者进行探索性访谈,随后对109名开发者进行问卷调查,分析工具采用模式、提示策略以及影响有效性的组织因素。结果表明,经验水平会调节开发者对GenAI收益的感知,生产力提升在开发者之间分布不均;组织规模同时影响工具选择与使用强度;而对项目上下文了解有限被识别为最主要的障碍。文章最后为开发者、组织和工具厂商总结了可操作的实践启示。

问题
在德国严格监管(GDPR、EU AI Act)的背景下,缺乏对生成式AI工具采用动态的系统实证研究,尤其是交互深度、组织约束与经验因素如何影响其有效使用。
方法
采用混合方法:先对18位从业者进行探索性访谈,再对109名开发者开展问卷调查,分析工具采用模式、提示策略与组织影响因素。
评估
基于访谈与问卷的质性加量化分析,得出经验水平调节感知收益、组织规模影响工具选择与使用强度、项目上下文认知不足是最大障碍等结论,并据此提出面向开发者、组织与工具厂商的建议。
原文摘要(Abstract)

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools have seen rapid adoption among software developers. While adoption rates in the industry are rising, the underlying factors influencing the effective use of these tools, including the depth of interaction, organizational constraints, and experience-related considerations, have not been thoroughly investigated. This issue is particularly relevant in environments with stringent regulatory requirements, such as Germany, where practitioners must address the GDPR and the EU AI Act while balancing productivity gains with intellectual property considerations. Despite the significant impact of GenAI on software engineering, to the best of our knowledge, no empirical study has systematically examined the adoption dynamics of GenAI tools within the German context. To address this gap, we present a comprehensive mixed-methods study on GenAI adoption among German software engineers. Specifically, we conducted 18 exploratory interviews with practitioners, followed by a developer survey with 109 participants. We analyze patterns of tool adoption, prompting strategies, and organizational factors that influence effectiveness. Our results indicate that experience level moderates the perceived benefits of GenAI tools, and productivity gains are not evenly distributed among developers. Further, organizational size affects both tool selection and the intensity of tool use. Limited awareness of the project context is identified as the most significant barrier. We summarize a set of actionable implications for developers, organizations, and tool vendors seeking to advance artificial intelligence (AI) assisted software development.

链接与引用

DOI 原文 · arXiv · PDF(开放获取) · DBLP

BibTeX
@inproceedings{abs-2601-16700,
  title = {Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the German Software Engineering Industry: An Empirical Study},
  author = {Ludwig Felder and Tobias Eisenreich and Mahsa Fischer and Stefan Wagner and Chunyang Chen},
  booktitle = {FSE},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1145/3803437.3805207}
}